From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kevin@carhart.net>
Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.63;
 helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.63])
 by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E79D77C83
 for <Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>;
 Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp
X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com
Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227])
 (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp)
 by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EDB6D807;
 Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v7G3TULq017625;
 Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:29:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost)
 by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v7G3TO31017602;
 Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:29:29 -0700
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Carhart <kevin@carhart.net>
To: Karl Dahlke <eklhad@comcast.net>
cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
In-Reply-To: <20170715225338.eklhad@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1708152006320.7802@carhart.net>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1708151242480.10749@carhart.net>
 <alpine.LRH.2.03.1708151706370.12666@carhart.net>
 <20170715225338.eklhad@comcast.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] script in tree of document.written elements?
X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24
Precedence: list
List-Id: Edbrowse Development List <edbrowse-dev.lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/options/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/private/edbrowse-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com>
List-Help: <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev>, 
 <mailto:edbrowse-dev-request@lists.the-brannons.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 03:29:25 -0000

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote:

> It was not at all clear to me, is not at all clear to me, where to put the objects that result from document.write.
> innerHTML is obvious, document.write isnot.

Thank you for wrangling it in the first place.  I think it's 
semi-deprecated or Considered Harmful.  There are various articles 
frowning on it.  So it's one of those annoying constructs that shouldn't 
be used, but here it is in the tests itself.

Okay.  I just opened hello.html in firefox and firebug.  It puts the P 
immediately after the script.  The P has parentNode body.  <Script> is 
not part of its tree branch.

I'm also in acid3.acidtests.org in firebug right now to verify with this.
I'm opening up the document.forms.  There is only one and it is one of 
those tags that is part of the document.write inside of the last script, 
so I think it's an illustrative piece of evidence and it's easy to make 
sure you're on the element you want to be on.

document.form[0].parentNode is map, and
document.form[0].parentNode.parentNode is body

> I thought they should parse under the script that does the 
> document.write, that is reasonable, rational, but not based on any spec 
> or anything.

I think that's right.  And with script omitted from their descendancy 
trail/tree branch.  Could this actually be tidy-related?

This is going to be good.