From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.62; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.62]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E2577C83 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:53:52 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5AD871E4; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v7O9sHon002909; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:54:17 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v7O9sG9f002903; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:54:17 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 02:54:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Karl Dahlke cc: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170721160152.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170719113834.eklhad@comcast.net> <20170721160152.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] getAttributeNode / setAttributeNode X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:53:52 -0000 I was visiting my parents and afk, but I am back now and excited by the latest. On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote: > Ok I now convert foo-bar to fooBar, as you suggest, and as the acid test 0 suggests, but I think it's wweird. > > You say you're not finding the right properties in penultimate, but oh boy it's very subtle. Yeah. > There are several problems at play. > The selector we're looking for is #instructions:last-child, and I had to read some of the MIT code to see what that meant. Interesting. What is the MIT code? Is it like a CSS spec? > It was but it isn't any more, so the machinery looks like it's not working but it works just fine. > > So - I think we are just one step away from test 0 passing. Exactly!! I am glad you went there because now we both have our bearings in the same stuff. I completely agree about things getting clobbered later, creating the suggestion at jdb-time that it isn't working. I labored under this misapprehension for a while and wasted time before figuring this out. So as a workaround, I said wget http://acid3.acidtests.org, save it locally as index.html or another name, and then add alerts in the "test 0" code so that you can get your feedback from when it actually runs and not from jdb, later. > but tidy doesn't give us this node, so nothing lines up. Ah, is that right! So this is where we came in. You mentioned this a couple days ago and that was when I brought up the CSS components. So now we are really getting down to the problem. Amazing how much they pack into test zero. Woo! I am literally doing a little dance every day about new edbrowse. In honor of the fact that we are working on these Stylistic issues, the official soundtrack of edbrowse-dev, for a while at least, will be "Betcha By Golly Wow" by The Stylistics. Kevin