From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.62; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.62]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A1877DE8 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:31:25 -0700 (PDT) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 985FF3CC for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v851WF8g031747 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:32:15 -0700 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id v851WFss031744 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:32:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20170804110647.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20170804110647.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] suggested additions X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 01:31:25 -0000 Good question. I think it's both. It's because of the acid tests that we got into CSS, but at the same time, getting drescher and nasa has been based on find & fix. I think both things amount to a large catalog of scenario-like puzzles that can be picked up when we have time to work, and which have all been vetted or ratified that they will help our coverage. It's all the same DOM. I would consider toggling back and forth. If we are stuck with the one, go implement something raised by the other. On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Karl Dahlke wrote: > Curious. Would the acid tests uncover these 7 things? > The jury is still out on whether we should follow the acid tests, or find&fix, or both. > > Karl Dahlke > _______________________________________________