From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.61; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.61]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203EA779FB for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:15:31 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DB9140F; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w081Ibmu001094; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:18:38 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id w081Ibwi001088; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:18:37 -0800 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:18:36 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Chuck Hallenbeck cc: Edbrowse Development , lawrence baggett In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] Continuing Amazon issue X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 01:15:31 -0000 Hi Chuck, Larry & list, I hope we can do something on this, but it's more difficult than usual. Dominique said: > I'm not sure I'll be of much help but I'll try to look at it, even if > the code is obfuscated it should still run in duktape... I think the current situation is a runtime error or something unhandled from within the obfuscated file. That's my reason for thinking that we have to dig in. It's true that we toss endless amounts of js files from pages into duktape, which work beautifully, and we don't want or need to care about that JS code. > TypeError: undefined not callable (property 'querySelectorAll' of [object > Object]) > execution complete > TypeError: undefined not callable (property 'debug' of [object Object]) > execution complete Another tricky thing is that these don't have line numbers attached, so I'm assuming they are from event handlers, which are no longer in the form of readable JS. We've mentioned this to Sami as a feature request for duktape. I have been working on this over the weekend. I hope we can get through it and support amazon. Do we know any gangs of CS undergrads with itchy fingers for an interesting problem? I'm erring on the side of pessimism given the conflicting reports and assuming that Karl was able to do something else but not actually get over the moat yet. Does that seem right, KD? K