From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.60; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4906377D9F for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:52:45 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9788E708 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w0R3qwd8005470 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:52:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id w0R3qwgS005466 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:52:58 -0800 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:52:58 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20180026093225.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20180019150815.eklhad@comcast.net> <20180026093225.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] nasa / prepending "on" to events X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 03:52:46 -0000 > Still, I think that's confusing as hell. I agree. There is a looser tethering with a piece of GUI that you can click on, compared to the inline "on" handlers. Or no tethering at all. It's just a string, "click". There is no requirement about what the handler contains or what it's applied to. You can turn a dog into a cat using CSS, JS and HTML if you feel like intercepting and managing everything yourself.