From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.60; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F1D77893 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:20:52 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB4202C5 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w185LRt8029984 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:21:27 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id w185LQi9029980 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:21:26 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:21:26 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: Subject: [Edbrowse-dev] showscripts() (fwd) X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 05:20:52 -0000 I'm going back a few days to ask about showscripts(1). Hooray for the recent explosion of functionality - feels like longer than a few days, doesn't it? > The resulting list is left in document.scripts2, So the indexes need not correspond, but document.scripts2 is a superset that includes all of document.scripts and more, correct? So it seems like there would be no drawback to just always using scripts2 from now on. I don't rely on those indices staying the same anyway, since the website developers can move things around at any time. thanks Kevin