From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=8.23.224.60; helo=out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com; envelope-from=kevin@carhart.net; receiver= Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com (smtp-auth.no-ip.com [8.23.224.60]) by hurricane.the-brannons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E497A77AAF for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 23:00:10 -0800 (PST) X-No-IP: carhart.net@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from carhart.net (unknown [99.52.200.227]) (Authenticated sender: carhart.net@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76B862CD for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 23:00:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from carhart.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1B70nMa004130 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 23:00:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (kevin@localhost) by carhart.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id w1B70m31004112 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 23:00:49 -0800 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 23:00:44 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Carhart To: Edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com In-Reply-To: <20180111013137.eklhad@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20180110065158.eklhad@comcast.net> <20180111013137.eklhad@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Edbrowse-dev] nasa slow X-BeenThere: edbrowse-dev@lists.the-brannons.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Edbrowse Development List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 07:00:11 -0000 On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Karl Dahlke wrote: >> NASA needs it in order to run, right? > > No, they don't, and that's the point. It's just a big time waster from our point of view. > Acid test 0 needs it, and that's what put us on the trail, remember, but I think that's rare. Hmmmm But querySelector and querySelectorAll are used in vendor.js or nasa.js, right? These are common. So we have a couple of things in third. It sounds like we're saved by the bell for now since you figured out how to do both, which is great, but maybe some time in the future if it was necessary, we could delete jotform but keep qs/qsa? But come to think of it... wouldn't the query-result sets from qsa be incomplete if the styles have not been doled out to the elements previously and the selector is trying to select by styles?