Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Kraus <nicola...@gmail.com>
To: "Martín Hötzel Escardó" <"escardo..."@gmail.com>,
	"Homotopy Type Theory" <"HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Univalence <-> equivalence induction
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 19:09:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29ef9804-139a-6eb9-241c-b75c02a14094@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f23688f-af7c-43cb-946c-988f9d476848@googlegroups.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1985 bytes --]

Interesting! At least I had not been aware of it. I think there's 
another very short way to see that "equivalence induction without 
computation rule" implies univalence. Recall the 
Capriotti/Licata/Orton-Pitts observation which says that ua + ua-beta 
(i.e. a function A~B -> A=B which is a section of A=B -> A~B) imply full 
univalence; see arXiv:1712.04890, 4.6.
By distributivity of Pi and Sigma, we can write the type of pairs 
(ua,ua-beta) as a type family P indexed over equivalences: for types A,B 
and an equivalence e: A~B, we define P(A,B,e) := Sigma (p:A=B). 
id2equiv(p)=e. To inhabit P, we apply equivalence induction.
It seems there are many such "coherification"-constructions in HoTT.
-- Nicolai


On 18/05/18 07:36, Martín Hötzel Escardó wrote:
> Equivalence induction says that in order to prove something for all 
> equivalences, it is enough to prove it for all identity equivalences 
> for all types.
>
> This follows from univalence. But also, conversely, univalence follows 
> from it:
>
>  http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mhe/agda-new/UF-Univalence.html#JEq
>
> Is this known? Some years ago it was claimed in this list that 
> equivalence induction would be strictly weaker than univalence.
>
> To prove the above, I apply a technique I learned from Peter 
> Lumsdaine, that given an abstract identity system (Id, refl , J) with 
> no given "computation rule" for J, produces another identity system 
> (Id, refl , J' , J'-comp) with
> a "propositional computation rule" J'-comp for J'.
>
>    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mhe/agda-new/Lumsdaine.html
>
> Martin
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3244 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-19 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18  6:36 Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-05-18 13:04 ` [HoTT] " Egbert Rijke
2018-05-18 15:40   ` Michael Shulman
2018-05-18 21:03     ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-05-19 18:09 ` Nicolai Kraus [this message]
2018-05-19 19:38   ` Thierry Coquand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29ef9804-139a-6eb9-241c-b75c02a14094@gmail.com \
    --to="nicola..."@gmail.com \
    --cc="HomotopyT..."@googlegroups.com \
    --cc="escardo..."@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).