Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Awodey <awodey@cmu.edu>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>,
	categories net <categories@mta.ca>
Cc: Ivan Di Liberti <diliberti.math@gmail.com>
Subject: [HoTT] Bohemian L&P Café: Michael Shulman, May 4
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:23:26 -0400
Message-ID: <BEDBD6A8-A6FB-436F-AB1E-45162A257848@cmu.edu> (raw)

~~~ Bohemian Logical & Philosophical Café ~~~

Speaker: Michael Shulman

Title: The derivator of setoids.

May 4 at 16.00 Prague time (GMT+1)

The zoom link is on the page:


Can homotopy theory be developed in constructive mathematics, or even in ZF set theory without the axiom of choice? Recent work inspired by homotopy type theory has yielded two constructive homotopy theories (simplicial sets and equivariant cubical sets) that are classically equivalent to that of spaces, but it is unknown if they are constructively equivalent to each other. If they are not, then which one is correct? Or are they both correct, or both incorrect? What do these questions even mean?
I will propose one criterion for the correctness of a constructive homotopy theory of spaces: as a derivator, it should be the free cocompletion of a point. (A derivator is an enhancement of the homotopy category that remains 1-categorical, but can still express universal properties of this sort.) Then I will give some evidence that any such homotopy theory must have the curious property that its 1-truncation contains, not only sets, but also setoids. Specifically, the ex/lex completion of the category of sets defines a derivator that satisfies a relative version of the aforementioned universal property; thus it should be a localization of any derivator satisfying the absolute condition. This suggests that either setoids are an unavoidable aspect of constructive homotopy theory, or the criterion needs to be modified.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/BEDBD6A8-A6FB-436F-AB1E-45162A257848%40cmu.edu.

                 reply	other threads:[~2021-04-29  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BEDBD6A8-A6FB-436F-AB1E-45162A257848@cmu.edu \
    --to=awodey@cmu.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=diliberti.math@gmail.com \
    --cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.vuxu.org/hott

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V1 hott hott/ https://inbox.vuxu.org/hott \
	public-inbox-index hott

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git