From: Nicolai Kraus <nicolai.kraus@gmail.com>
To: Michael Shulman <shulman@sandiego.edu>
Cc: Homotopy Type Theory <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Re: Why do we need judgmental equality?
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:29:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+AZBBovXpX9wcskmyJKXsdvr003T80YVJLw7ALsm8TvHAibmA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOvivQx2Vpufx3+j0M4WR+t2QNPwCxNXa_QPixppPh8MCU=Rgg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 819 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 1:25 AM Michael Shulman <shulman@sandiego.edu>
wrote:
> The supposed arbitrariness of some types having strict eta and others
> not has been mentioned at least twice. However, I don't find it
> arbitrary at all [...] In particular, the difference in whether
> Sigma-types have strict eta
> or not simply lies in whether we are talking about positive
> Sigma-types or negative Sigma-types
Since I've mentioned eta for Sigma in this context: thanks for this
explanation, Mike!
-- Nicolai
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1440 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-17 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 11:54 [HoTT] " Felix Rech
2019-02-05 23:00 ` [HoTT] " Matt Oliveri
2019-02-06 4:13 ` Anders Mörtberg
2019-02-09 11:55 ` Felix Rech
2019-02-16 15:59 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-17 1:25 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-17 7:56 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-17 9:14 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-17 9:18 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-17 10:52 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-17 11:35 ` streicher
2019-02-17 11:44 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-17 14:24 ` Bas Spitters
2019-02-17 19:36 ` Thomas Streicher
2019-02-17 21:41 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-17 12:08 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-17 12:13 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-20 0:22 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-17 14:22 ` [Agda] " Andreas Abel
2019-02-17 9:05 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-17 13:29 ` Nicolai Kraus [this message]
2019-02-08 21:19 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2019-02-08 23:31 ` Valery Isaev
2019-02-09 1:41 ` Nicolai Kraus
2019-02-09 8:04 ` Valery Isaev
2019-02-09 1:58 ` Jon Sterling
2019-02-09 8:16 ` Valery Isaev
2019-02-09 1:30 ` Nicolai Kraus
2019-02-09 11:38 ` Thomas Streicher
2019-02-09 13:29 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-09 13:40 ` Théo Winterhalter
2019-02-09 11:57 ` Felix Rech
2019-02-09 12:39 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2019-02-11 6:58 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-18 17:37 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2019-02-18 19:22 ` Licata, Dan
2019-02-18 20:23 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2019-02-09 11:53 ` Felix Rech
2019-02-09 14:04 ` Nicolai Kraus
2019-02-09 14:26 ` Gabriel Scherer
2019-02-09 14:44 ` Jon Sterling
2019-02-09 20:34 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-11 12:17 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 13:04 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-11 15:09 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 17:20 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-11 18:17 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-11 18:45 ` Alexander Kurz
2019-02-11 22:58 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-12 2:09 ` Jacques Carette
2019-02-12 11:03 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-12 15:36 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-12 15:59 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 19:27 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 21:49 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-12 9:01 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-12 17:54 ` Michael Shulman
2019-02-13 6:37 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-13 10:01 ` Ansten Mørch Klev
2019-02-11 20:11 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 8:23 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 13:03 ` Jon Sterling
2019-02-11 13:22 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 13:37 ` Jon Sterling
2019-02-11 6:51 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-09 12:30 ` [HoTT] " Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-02-11 7:01 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 8:04 ` Valery Isaev
2019-02-11 8:28 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 8:37 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-02-11 9:32 ` Rafaël Bocquet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+AZBBovXpX9wcskmyJKXsdvr003T80YVJLw7ALsm8TvHAibmA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nicolai.kraus@gmail.com \
--cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \
--cc=shulman@sandiego.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).