From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Received: by 10.66.232.227 with SMTP id tr3mr3641365pac.45.1466088121930; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.20.228 with SMTP id r33ls535237otr.92.gmail; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.35.12 with SMTP id j12mr47374otb.29.1466088121434; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r140si1730081vkf.0.2016.06.16.07.42.01 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of urs.sc...@googlemail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass head...@googlemail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of urs.sc...@googlemail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=urs.sc...@googlemail.com; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=googlemail.com Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u64so76008856vkf.3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EIJliGJfqZIfOTJRym6nYvd2vLrJgMGpMWx3r7PYPGI=; b=u6veRNIAwelCG96nsE+FyyfgEN26DaT3Z2tBtp+OcT4QiRIEwYic4fIi1Qq96xgHoQ AowZ6Wh64EtGK7BZUdTp4AtTxDlAofbjThubTpf20Ies0jDlFgCw1GL2tFu5bqH7Iw0z Z9icjhWbcN6mjRToiByYjssaf0FFvIjls0e9DLyXSXXAN9M9Mun3WylNcenY4U6+ZpTv 4Cpmiq53FfX6XP2ERjQwdM3qXEmLq2HC5kY736oJAa6XS7k0JrNFZZwq7rEi+owst/VT 2z6xtFmQeopczInIi+s7h1fTZastO9z+WHNBZpirDY0XwcHORbXYezw7hldyB71uzkKt JTLA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKHrGJxfAyDasRsz+yqZYy49M+jrYXZYT2suGpJ9V3DtqYVf7qc8q5B3kQON5WRg9kn9ZDqhO17EgyDaQ== X-Received: by 10.31.217.129 with SMTP id q123mr2255084vkg.102.1466088121113; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.88.140 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:42:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8C57894C7413F04A98DDF5629FEC90B138B93747@Pli.gst.uqam.ca> <2850536B-0DB8-4F6D-AB3F-D5C28F6855B4@cmu.edu> From: Urs Schreiber Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:42:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HoTT] Is synthetic the right word? To: Bas Spitters Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?andr=C3=A9_hirschowitz?= , Andrej Bauer , Homotopy Type Theory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > The Blakers-Massey theorem has *interesting* interpretations in other > oo-toposes. > Are you suggesting that the same may be true for the synthetic results > that have been proved about spheres? > The consensus seemed that be that that was not the case (yet?). Indeed, for spheres the case is not so interesting..This is because, at least in Grothendieck infinity-toposes H, then the fact that the inverse image functor H <--- S from the base S (left adjoint to global section) preserves all homotopy colimits and finite homotopy limits, means that the usual spheres in H coincide with the usual spheres in S. But synthetic homotopy theory is not only about spheres.