From: Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine <p.l.lu...@gmail.com>
To: Steve Awodey <awo...@cmu.edu>
Cc: Michael Shulman <shu...@sandiego.edu>,
Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se>,
homotopy Type Theory <homotopyt...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Semantics of higher inductive types
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:08:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAkwb-nogDyVRwnvDXUphBQb0ttL-TuHfSahnrSMhFnuunc7hw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9F58F820-A54A-46E7-93DC-F814D4BEE0C6@cmu.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7553 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Steve Awodey <awo...@cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> you mean the propositional truncation or suspension operations might lead
to cardinals outside of a Grothendieck Universe?
Exactly, yes. There’s no reason I know of to think they *need* to, but
with the construction of Mike’s and my paper, they do. And adding stronger
conditions on the cardinal used won’t help. The problem is that one takes
a fibrant replacement to go from the “pre-suspension” to the suspension
(more precisely: a (TC,F) factorisation, to go from the universal family of
pre-suspensions to the universal family of suspensions); and fibrant
replacement blows up the fibers to be the size of the *base* of the
family. So the pre-suspension is small, but the suspension — although
essentially small — ends up as large as the universe one’s using.
So here’s a very precise problem which is as far as I know open:
(*) Construct an operation Σ : U –> U, where U is Voevodsky’s universe,
together with appropriate maps N, S : Û –> Û over Σ, and a homotopy m from
N to S over Σ, which together exhibit U as “closed under suspension”.
I asked a related question on mathoverflow a couple of years ago:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/219588/pullback-stable-model-of-fibrewise-suspension-of-fibrations-in-simplicial-sets
David White suggested he could see an answer to that question (which would
probably also answer (*) here) based on the comments by Karol Szumiło and
Tyler Lawson, using the adjunction with Top, but I wasn’t quite able to
piece it together.
–p.
>
> > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Michael Shulman <shu...@sandiego.edu>
wrote:
> >
> > Do we actually know that the Kan simplicial set model has a *universe
> > closed under* even simple HITs? It's not trivial because this would
> > mean we could (say) propositionally truncate or suspend the generic
> > small Kan fibration and get another *small* Kan fibration, whereas the
> > base of these fibrations is not small, and fibrant replacement doesn't
> > in general preserve smallness of fibrations with large base spaces.
> >
> > (Also, the current L-S paper doesn't quite give a general syntactic
> > scheme, only a general semantic framework with suggestive implications
> > for the corresponding syntax.)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Steve Awodey <awo...@cmu.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Thierry Coquand <Thierry...@cse.gu.se
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> If we are only interested in providing one -particular- model of HITs,
> >> the paper
> >> on cubical type theory describes a way to interpret HIT together
with a
> >> univalent
> >> universe which is stable by HIT operations. This gives in particular
the
> >> consistency
> >> and the proof theoretic power of this extension of type theory.
> >>
> >>
> >> but the Kan simplicial set model already does this — right?
> >> don’t get me wrong — I love the cubes, and they have lots of nice
properties
> >> for models of HoTT
> >> — but there was never really a question of the consistency or
coherence of
> >> simple HITs like propositional truncation or suspension.
> >>
> >> the advance in the L-S paper is to give a general scheme for defining
HITs
> >> syntactically
> >> (a definition, if you like, of what a HIT is, rather than a family of
> >> examples),
> >> and then a general description of the semantics of these,
> >> in a range of models of the basic theory.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> The approach uses an operation of “flattening an open box”, which
solves
> >> in
> >> this case the issue of interpreting HIT with parameters (such as
> >> propositional
> >> truncation or suspension) without any coherence issue.
> >> Since the syntax used in this paper is so close to the semantics, we
> >> limited
> >> ourselves to a syntactical presentation of this interpretation. But
it can
> >> directly
> >> be transformed to a semantical interpretation, as explained in the
following
> >> note
> >> (which also incorporates a nice simplification of the operation of
> >> flattering
> >> an open box noticed by my coauthors). I also try to make more explicit
in
> >> the note
> >> what is the problem solved by the “flattening boxes” method.
> >>
> >> Only the cases of the spheres and propositional truncation are
described,
> >> but one
> >> would expect the method to generalise to other HITs covered e.g. in
the HoTT
> >> book.
> >>
> >> On 25 May 2017, at 20:25, Michael Shulman <shu...@sandiego.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> The following long-awaited paper is now available:
> >>
> >> Semantics of higher inductive types
> >> Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Mike Shulman
> >> https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07088
> >>
> >> From the abstract:
> >>
> >> We introduce the notion of *cell monad with parameters*: a
> >> semantically-defined scheme for specifying homotopically well-behaved
> >> notions of structure. We then show that any suitable model category
> >> has *weakly stable typal initial algebras* for any cell monad with
> >> parameters. When combined with the local universes construction to
> >> obtain strict stability, this specializes to give models of specific
> >> higher inductive types, including spheres, the torus, pushout types,
> >> truncations, the James construction, and general localisations.
> >>
> >> Our results apply in any sufficiently nice Quillen model category,
> >> including any right proper simplicial Cisinski model category (such as
> >> simplicial sets) and any locally presentable locally cartesian closed
> >> category (such as sets) with its trivial model structure. In
> >> particular, any locally presentable locally cartesian closed
> >> (∞,1)-category is presented by some model category to which our
> >> results apply.
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> >> "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
> >> email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> >> "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
> >> email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> >> "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
> >> email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to HomotopyTypeThe...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9902 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 18:25 Michael Shulman
2017-05-26 0:17 ` [HoTT] " Emily Riehl
2017-06-01 14:23 ` Thierry Coquand
2017-06-01 14:43 ` Michael Shulman
2017-06-01 15:30 ` Steve Awodey
2017-06-01 15:38 ` Michael Shulman
2017-06-01 15:56 ` Steve Awodey
2017-06-01 16:08 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine [this message]
2017-06-06 9:19 ` Andrew Swan
2017-06-06 10:03 ` Andrew Swan
2017-06-06 13:35 ` Michael Shulman
2017-06-06 16:22 ` Andrew Swan
2017-06-06 19:36 ` Michael Shulman
2017-06-06 20:59 ` Andrew Swan
2017-06-07 9:40 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2017-06-07 9:57 ` Thierry Coquand
[not found] ` <ed7ad345-85e4-4536-86d7-a57fbe3313fe@googlegroups.com>
2017-06-07 23:06 ` Michael Shulman
2017-06-08 6:35 ` Andrew Swan
2018-09-14 11:15 ` Thierry Coquand
2018-09-14 14:16 ` Andrew Swan
2018-10-01 13:02 ` Thierry Coquand
2018-11-10 15:52 ` Anders Mörtberg
2018-11-10 18:21 ` Gabriel Scherer
2017-06-08 4:57 ` CARLOS MANUEL MANZUETA
2018-11-12 12:30 ` Ali Caglayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAkwb-nogDyVRwnvDXUphBQb0ttL-TuHfSahnrSMhFnuunc7hw@mail.gmail.com \
--to="p.l.lu..."@gmail.com \
--cc="Thierry..."@cse.gu.se \
--cc="awo..."@cmu.edu \
--cc="homotopyt..."@googlegroups.com \
--cc="shu..."@sandiego.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).