From: Bas Spitters <b.a.w.spitters@gmail.com>
To: homotopytypetheory <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HoTT] Semantics of QIITs ?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:57:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOoPQuQBwyvbY_f3qNZOgEB7nxQHGUigqXjNhbDmCvB3xnVaOw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
What is the status of the semantics of quotient inductive inductive types?
Looking at the literature there's some progress on reducing QIITs to
simpler constructions, but this does not seem to have led to a
convenient semantic result.
E.g. QIITs do not seem to be treated in the work by Lumdaine and Shulman.
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inductive-inductive+type
Do we know that the prototypical QIITs from the book (e.g. Cauchy
reals) are supported in the usual models of HoTT?
Thanks,
Bas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/CAOoPQuQBwyvbY_f3qNZOgEB7nxQHGUigqXjNhbDmCvB3xnVaOw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-16 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 14:57 Bas Spitters [this message]
2019-05-16 15:39 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-16 15:50 ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-16 16:15 ` András Kovács
2019-05-16 18:50 ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-20 16:16 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 17:54 ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-20 18:35 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 19:59 ` Jon Sterling
2019-05-20 21:04 ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-20 22:17 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 23:26 ` Jon Sterling
2019-05-21 0:28 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-05-21 2:45 ` Jasper Hugunin
2019-05-21 8:33 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-21 19:56 ` Matt Oliveri
2019-05-21 8:39 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-21 11:47 ` [HoTT] " Andrew Swan
2019-05-21 12:14 ` Bas Spitters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOoPQuQBwyvbY_f3qNZOgEB7nxQHGUigqXjNhbDmCvB3xnVaOw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=b.a.w.spitters@gmail.com \
--cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).