Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bas Spitters <b.a.w.spitters@gmail.com>
To: Thorsten Altenkirch <Thorsten.Altenkirch@nottingham.ac.uk>
Cc: "András Kovács" <puttamalac@gmail.com>,
	homotopytypetheory <homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com>,
	"Ambrus Kaposi" <kaposi.ambrus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Semantics of QIITs ?
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 19:54:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOoPQuRJ5QU2GTqctjGSJax0CXkBWWq7GEYcf0EEox3izZTDeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68D3FF39-6345-47B0-B905-72BDD282583A@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>

As you say, Mike and Peter note that:
"the idea is that higher inductive types can be used to construct free
algebras for infinitary algebraic theories. However, Blass showed
(modulo a large
cardinal assumption) that these cannot be constructed in ZF [Bla83]."
In fact, they construct an uncountable regular cardinal explicitly (Thm 9.1).
https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07088
So, QITs do add extra expresivity.


My question is about "small" QIITs (Cauchy reals, ...) in homotopical
models, so the setoid model does not really count.
However, has it been proved even in that case that such QIITs exist?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 6:17 PM Thorsten Altenkirch
<Thorsten.Altenkirch@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Do we know wether the existence of QI(I)Ts isn't a new constructive principle?
>
> Mike and Peter show that there are QITs which aren't constructible from quotients. However, we may still be able to justify a type theory with QITs without using them. E.g. in the Setoid model we can construct many QITs including the Reals (I think) but this is maybe because choice is provable for the setoids which are obtained from sets (like Nat). But what about a QIT which uses a setoid for which we don't have choice?
>
> Thorsten
>
>
> On 16/05/2019, 19:50, "Bas Spitters" <b.a.w.spitters@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for confirming that this is still open in homotopical models.
>
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
> where permitted by law.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/68D3FF39-6345-47B0-B905-72BDD282583A%40exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/CAOoPQuRJ5QU2GTqctjGSJax0CXkBWWq7GEYcf0EEox3izZTDeQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16 14:57 Bas Spitters
2019-05-16 15:39 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-16 15:50   ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-16 16:15     ` András Kovács
2019-05-16 18:50       ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-20 16:16         ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 17:54           ` Bas Spitters [this message]
2019-05-20 18:35             ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 19:59               ` Jon Sterling
2019-05-20 21:04                 ` Bas Spitters
2019-05-20 22:17                   ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-20 23:26                     ` Jon Sterling
2019-05-21  0:28                       ` Matt Oliveri
2019-05-21  2:45                         ` Jasper Hugunin
2019-05-21  8:33                         ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-21 19:56                           ` Matt Oliveri
2019-05-21  8:39                       ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2019-05-21 11:47 ` [HoTT] " Andrew Swan
2019-05-21 12:14   ` Bas Spitters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOoPQuRJ5QU2GTqctjGSJax0CXkBWWq7GEYcf0EEox3izZTDeQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=b.a.w.spitters@gmail.com \
    --cc=Thorsten.Altenkirch@nottingham.ac.uk \
    --cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kaposi.ambrus@gmail.com \
    --cc=puttamalac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).