Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Shulman <shulman@sandiego.edu>
To: "HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com"
Subject: [HoTT] Are cubical sets hypercomplete?
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:02:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOvivQyPJsVzRtJw7uWX=LJH0-3r7TarVm=CSaqfoFU4k7foqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I have always assumed that cubical set models, like the simplicial set
model, satisfy Whitehead's principle (one form of which is the
statement that if all n-truncations of a type are contractible, then
it is contractible).  However, since cubical set models aren't known
to have an underlying model structure that's equivalent to simplicial
sets (and, as discussed previously on this list, at least one model
structure for cubical sets is known to be *not* equivalent to
simplicial sets), it's not completely obvious to me how to prove this.
Has anyone checked carefully that one or more cubical set models
satisfy Whitehead's principle -- and in particular, is the argument
fully constructive?  I could imagine that it might require something
like countable choice.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/CAOvivQyPJsVzRtJw7uWX%3DLJH0-3r7TarVm%3DCSaqfoFU4k7foqw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

                 reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOvivQyPJsVzRtJw7uWX=LJH0-3r7TarVm=CSaqfoFU4k7foqw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shulman@sandiego.edu \
    --cc=homotopytypetheory@googlegroups.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).