Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafaël Bocquet" <rafael.bocquet@ens.fr>
To: HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HoTT] Frobenius eliminators
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:58:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a20122bc-289b-4fce-1183-76b66aed395f@ens.fr> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3459 bytes --]

This is related to a previous discussion on this mailing list : 
"What is known and/or written about “Frobenius eliminators”?".

I noticed recently that the Frobenius eliminator for identity types is 
related to the notion of strong logical equivalence (the trivial 
fibrations of the left semi-model structure on the category of CwAs with 
Sigma and Id introduced in https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.00037,"The 
homotopy theory of type theories").

The Frobenius, Paulin-Mohring variant of the J eliminator is presented 
by the following inference rule:
   G |- A type   G |- x : A
   G, y:A, p:Id(x,y) |- B(y,p) type*
   G, y:A, p:Id(x,y), b:B(y,p) |- C(y,p,b) type
   G, b:B(x,refl(x)) |- c : C(x,refl(x),b) type
   G |- y : A    G |- p : Id(x,y)    G |- b:B(y,p)
   G |- J(A,x,B,C,c,y,p,b) : C(y,p,b)

(where "B(y,p) type*" means that B(y,p) is a finite sequence of types 
over "G, y:A, p:Id(x,y)", i.e. a context in the contextual slice over 
"G, y:A, p:Id(x,y)")

(In the discussion linked above, Valery Isaev gives a proof that if the 
type theory includes sigma types, the "simple" Paulin-Mohring eliminator 
is strong enough to derive the "Frobenius" variant. This is also proven 
by Paige Randall North in https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03567, in a more 
categorical setting.)

I consider roughly the same framework as in "The homotopy theory of type 

Recall that a contextual morphism F : C --> D is a strong logical 
equivalence if it satisfies term lifting and type lifting conditions:
- type lifting: for every context G in C, F_G : Ty_C(G) -> Ty_D(F(G)) is 
- term lifting: for every context G in C and type A over G, F_A : 
Ter_C(G,A) -> Ter_D(F(G),F(A)) is surjective.

Let C be a CwA with Id and refl. The J eliminator for some pointed type 
(A,x) in some context G can be seen as the statement that the contextual 
morphism F : C[G,y:A,p:Id(x,y)] --> C[G] (where C[G] is a notation for 
the contextual slice over G), sending (y,p) to (x,refl(x)), satisfies 
the term lifting condition. Indeed, the input of the term lifting 
condition is the data of B, C and c, and the output is a term J in the 
context G,y:A,p:Id(x,y),b:B(y,p) of type C(y,p,b), such that F(J) = c.

The type lifting condition can then be derived, assuming that C does not 
include weird type equalities (for instance, when C is cofibrant/freely 
generated, or when C is equipped with a hierarchy of universes ensuring 
that every type belongs to a unique universe).

If we only require F to be a weak logical equivalence (a weak 
equivalence in the left semi-model structure), then we obtain 
propositional identity types. I think that asking for F to be an 
isomorphism forces the identity types to become extensional.

Has this been studied before ? Can this be extended to the elimination 
rules of other type formers ?

Best regards,
Rafaël Bocquet

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/HomotopyTypeTheory/a20122bc-289b-4fce-1183-76b66aed395f%40ens.fr.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4718 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a20122bc-289b-4fce-1183-76b66aed395f@ens.fr \
    --to=rafael.bocquet@ens.fr \
    --cc=HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).