From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 13:06:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Oliveri To: Homotopy Type Theory Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <7ACEB87C-CF6E-4ACC-A803-2E44D7D0374A@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HoTT] A small observation on cumulativity and the failure of initiality MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_22675_1943378934.1508097993357" ------=_Part_22675_1943378934.1508097993357 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22676_217404633.1508097993357" ------=_Part_22676_217404633.1508097993357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday, October 13, 2017 at 11:50:40 AM UTC-4, Michael Shulman wrote: > > In an ideal world, a judgment x:A |- t:B > would have at most one derivation, so that we could induct on > derivations and still consider the syntactic model to be built out of > terms rather than derivations. > I think this can practically always be arranged. But it's not clear that it actually makes things easier. So I think you might be confused about when and why the interpreter would actually look at derivations. ------=_Part_22676_217404633.1508097993357 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Friday, October 13, 2017 at 11:50:40 AM UTC-4, Michael Shulman wrote:
In an ideal world, a judgment x:A |- t:B
would have at most one derivation, so that we could induct on
derivations and still consider the syntactic model to be built out of
terms rather than derivations.

I think this can practically always be arranged. But it's not clear that it actually makes things easier. So I think you might be confused about when and why the interpreter would actually look at derivations.
------=_Part_22676_217404633.1508097993357-- ------=_Part_22675_1943378934.1508097993357--