From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:32:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Swan <wakeli...@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyT...@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <dccfbf34-c2c2-4864-8386-93561342e6ad@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Two Papers on Lifting Problems and the Small Object Argument
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_11825_2125232006.1519633966264"

------=_Part_11825_2125232006.1519633966264
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_11826_360738901.1519633966264"

------=_Part_11826_360738901.1519633966264
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

I've recently posted a pair of papers on the arXiv that might be of 
interest to some people on this list. Both are on my work on lifting 
problems in fibrations and the small object argument. An interesting side 
effect was that a construction used can be seen as a kind of higher 
inductive type generalising W-types (this is the subject of the second 
paper).

1. Lifting Problems in Grothendieck Fibrations 
<https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06718>
2. W-Types with Reductions and the Small Object Argument 
<https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07588>

Comments, questions, corrections, etc are welcome.

Best,
Andrew

------=_Part_11826_360738901.1519633966264
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Dear all,<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve recently posted a pa=
ir of papers on the arXiv that might be of interest to some people on this =
list. Both are on my work on lifting problems in fibrations and the small o=
bject argument. An interesting side effect was that a construction used can=
 be seen as a kind of higher inductive type generalising W-types (this is t=
he subject of the second paper).</div><div><br></div><div>1.=C2=A0<a href=
=3D"https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06718">Lifting Problems in Grothendieck Fibr=
ations</a></div><div>2.=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07588">W=
-Types with Reductions and the Small Object Argument</a></div><div><br></di=
v><div>Comments, questions, corrections, etc are welcome.</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>Best,</div><div>Andrew</div></div>
------=_Part_11826_360738901.1519633966264--

------=_Part_11825_2125232006.1519633966264--