From: Ali Caglayan <alizter@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HoTT] Real Projective space (and other projective spaces too)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6d4c35e-a03b-41f5-b7d3-b7f6a63cba72@googlegroups.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]
There are a family of fibrations called "generalised hopf fibrations".
For the real hopf fibrations we have:
S⁰→Sⁿ→ℝℙⁿ
For the complex (usual) hopf fibrations we have:
S¹→S²ⁿ⁺¹→ℂℙⁿ
For the quarternionic hopf fibrations we have:
S³→S⁴ⁿ⁺³→ℍℙⁿ
And finally (only when n <= 2) we have the octionic hopf fibrations:
S⁷→S⁸ⁿ⁺⁷→𝕆ℙⁿ
This screams to me an alternative definition for ℝℙⁿ (and maybe ℂℙⁿ,...)
Inductive RP (n:ℕ) :=
| map : Sⁿ -> RP n
| glue : (x y:S⁰) -> map(in x) = map(in y)
Where in : S⁰→Sⁿ is the obvious inclusion map.
Now showing that this is equivalent to the usual definition would
essentially require a construction of the fibrations they were defined
from. This fibration is not so easy however, as we cannot 'cheat' and use
the H-space fibration.
Now the main advantage I see with this definition is that it allows the
complex, quarterionic etc. projective spaces to be constructed similarly. I
don't think anybody has constructed quarternionic projective space although
it should definitely be doable. the main questions arise when octionic
projective space is considered as in classical AT it degernates pretty
quickly. (Does this still happen in HoTT, if yes, how so?).
Finally a disclaimer, I thought about these whilst traveling and haven't
had the time to really put some meat on them. Though hopefully it might
strike a chord with anyone who has considered a similar thing.
I would love to hear your thoughts and feelings about such things.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5051 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-18 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-18 14:30 Ali Caglayan [this message]
2018-08-18 14:33 ` [HoTT] " Ali Caglayan
2018-08-18 14:45 ` [HoTT] " Dan Christensen
2018-08-18 16:17 ` Guillaume Brunerie
2018-08-18 19:35 ` Dan Christensen
2018-08-19 6:36 ` Guillaume Brunerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6d4c35e-a03b-41f5-b7d3-b7f6a63cba72@googlegroups.com \
--to=alizter@gmail.com \
--cc=HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).