public inbox for howm-eng@lists.osdn.me
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yacinechaouche at yahoo.com (chaouche yacine)
Subject: [Howm-eng 167] Slow searches
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:49:49 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070022946.1579200.1599997789503@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1070022946.1579200.1599997789503.ref@mail.yahoo.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2148 bytes --]

Dear howm users,
I wanted to take the opportunity of the recent Kenneth Wyatt's post on the mailing list to bring the subject of howm searches (C-c , g). 
In the beginning, the searches were pretty fast, but as time went by, I was getting more and more impatient to get the results. It's not very slow, but slow enough to discourage me from using howm as a note taking tool anymore.
First, let me show you the howm-search-path and the size of each directory in that path (du -sh output) :

ychaouche#ychaouche-PC 12:36:54 ~ $ grep howm .emacs.d/init.el
[...]
;; search other directories in addition to `howm-directory'.
(setq howm-search-path '("~/NOTES/LOG/" "~/DATA/WIKIPAGES/" "~/.kde/share/apps/konversation/logs/" "~/.xchat2/xchatlogs/" "~/NOTES/TXT/" "~/DATA/BACKUPS/NEWWIKI/data/pages"))
[...]ychaouche#ychaouche-PC 12:37:45 ~ $ du -sh ~/NOTES/LOG/ ~/DATA/WIKIPAGES/ ~/.kde/share/apps/konversation/logs/ ~/.xchat2/xchatlogs/ ~/NOTES/TXT/ ~/DATA/BACKUPS/NEWWIKI/data/pages
3.8M    /home/ychaouche/NOTES/LOG/
2.3M    /home/ychaouche/DATA/WIKIPAGES/
33M     /home/ychaouche/.kde/share/apps/konversation/logs/
9.4M    /home/ychaouche/.xchat2/xchatlogs/
1.6M    /home/ychaouche/NOTES/TXT/
1.1M    /home/ychaouche/DATA/BACKUPS/NEWWIKI/data/pages
ychaouche#ychaouche-PC 12:37:50 ~ $


Approximately 50 Megs of text to search, plus the howm directroy itself which is less than 5 megs

ychaouche#ychaouche-PC 12:39:49 ~/howm $ dush
8.0K    ./2020
296K    ./2019
1.7M    ./2018
2.2M    ./2017
4.1M    .
ychaouche#ychaouche-PC 12:39:50 ~/howm $
So 55 Megs in all.


For example, a search on "dnssec" has taken approximatively 27 seconds (this was measured very poorly with eyesight on the desktop clock, from 12:42:09 PM to 12:41:36 PM). This is a little bit discouraging.
My questions : 
1/ Is this expected ? 
2/ If the search is time proportionnal to the size of the data that howm is parsing, can I do anything to help it ? 


Yassine.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/archives/howm-eng/attachments/20200913/176be1c5/attachment.html>

       reply	other threads:[~2020-09-13 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1070022946.1579200.1599997789503.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2020-09-13 11:49 ` yacinechaouche [this message]
2020-09-13 12:31   ` [Howm-eng 169] " khi
2020-09-14  9:14     ` [Howm-eng 170] " yacinechaouche
2020-09-14 12:29       ` [Howm-eng 171] " khi
2020-09-15  9:30         ` [Howm-eng 172] " yacinechaouche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070022946.1579200.1599997789503@mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=howm-eng@lists.osdn.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).