From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: xma at gnu.org (Xavier Maillard)
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:00:10 +0200
Subject: [Howm-eng 46] Re: customization
In-Reply-To: <m3fxtxlti8.wl@id.domain> (khi@users.sourceforge.jp)
References: <m3ve2wl8qh.wl@id.domain>
	<200804060000.m3600Ip7007684@localhost.localdomain>
	<m3fxtxlti8.wl@id.domain>
Message-ID: <200804080000.m3800AnW005414@localhost.localdomain>


   > This is an idea but why not take advantage of the abbrev
   > mechanism offered by emacs itself ? I do not know whether emacs
   > permits such abreviations though. Plus, with emacs 23, something
   > has changed on this side. (I am putting emacs-devel into the Cc
   > to get their feeling about this particular point).

   Hmm, I cannot understand your suggestion.  Would you give me a
   concrete example of desired behaviors (not codes) ?

Well something as simple as "> " expanding to ">>> ".

   By the way, do you know that you can type "C-c , i" to insert a
   registered keyword with completions?

Yes I know this _but_ it won't insert the >>> thingie if the
keyword does not exist first. So in my case (I am starting so my
keyword bank is almost empty), it is pretty useless currently.

Regards,

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org