From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hugows at gmail.com (Hugo Schmitt)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:57:09 -0300
Subject: [Howm-eng 82] Re: Effective use of <<< or >>> ?
In-Reply-To: <200804221949.m3MJn1IY003764@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200804152203.m3FM3pVU004987@localhost.localdomain>
	<m34p9vz8a2.wl@id.domain>
	<200804221949.m3MJn1IY003764@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <2f1c7d020804221357o5aa79537i991caacf2126d399@mail.gmail.com>

I'm also in doubt about how to use them.
To me, a simpler tagging markup (http://lisperati.com/tagging.html) is
easier to understand and use:

 *todo groceries
 milk, soup, coffee

I'd like to implement those tags in howm :)

Regards,
Hugo

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Xavier Maillard <xma at gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:03:51 +0200,
> > Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > > It is not really clear how one should use the goto and come-from
> > > links. How are you all doing ? Is it prefered to use them as much
> > > as possible or not ?
> >
> > I also want to hear it. :-)
>
> Hum okay :)
>
>
> > In my experience, these are convenient for come-from keywords.
> > - names of machines
> > - names of softwares/commands
> > - names of authors of interesting books/papers
> > - names of lectures
>
> This is also how I am currently using them.
>
>
> > I cannot show a good general guide because I'm lazy, loose, and bad at
> > tidying.  I've already given up well-ordered notes.  Howm may be
> > suitable for those who are tired from strict systems.
>
> Actually, I think you totally are right. If I have chosen howm, this is especially for this: free form writing. But I am also curious so my questions...
>
> Regards
>
> Xavier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Howm-eng mailing list
> Howm-eng at lists.sourceforge.jp
> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/howm-eng
>