public inbox for howm-eng@lists.osdn.me
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Howm-eng 78]  Effective use of <<< or >>> ?
@ 2008-04-15 22:03 xma
  2008-04-21 12:45 ` [Howm-eng 80] " khi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: xma @ 2008-04-15 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi,

It is not really clear how one should use the goto and come-from
links. How are you all doing ? Is it prefered to use them as much
as possible or not ?

Regards,

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Howm-eng 80] Re: Effective use of <<< or >>> ?
  2008-04-15 22:03 [Howm-eng 78] Effective use of <<< or >>> ? xma
@ 2008-04-21 12:45 ` khi
  2008-04-22 19:49   ` [Howm-eng 81] " xma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: khi @ 2008-04-21 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi.

At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:03:51 +0200,
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> It is not really clear how one should use the goto and come-from
> links. How are you all doing ? Is it prefered to use them as much
> as possible or not ?

I also want to hear it. :-)

In my experience, these are convenient for come-from keywords.
- names of machines
- names of softwares/commands
- names of authors of interesting books/papers
- names of lectures

I cannot show a good general guide because I'm lazy, loose, and bad at
tidying.  I've already given up well-ordered notes.  Howm may be
suitable for those who are tired from strict systems.

-- 
khi at users.sourceforge.jp



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Howm-eng 81] Re: Effective use of <<< or >>> ?
  2008-04-21 12:45 ` [Howm-eng 80] " khi
@ 2008-04-22 19:49   ` xma
  2008-04-22 20:57     ` [Howm-eng 82] " hugows
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: xma @ 2008-04-22 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)


> At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:03:51 +0200,
> Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > It is not really clear how one should use the goto and come-from
> > links. How are you all doing ? Is it prefered to use them as much
> > as possible or not ?
> 
> I also want to hear it. :-)

Hum okay :)

> In my experience, these are convenient for come-from keywords.
> - names of machines
> - names of softwares/commands
> - names of authors of interesting books/papers
> - names of lectures

This is also how I am currently using them.

> I cannot show a good general guide because I'm lazy, loose, and bad at
> tidying.  I've already given up well-ordered notes.  Howm may be
> suitable for those who are tired from strict systems.

Actually, I think you totally are right. If I have chosen howm, this is especially for this: free form writing. But I am also curious so my questions...

Regards

Xavier



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Howm-eng 82] Re: Effective use of <<< or >>> ?
  2008-04-22 19:49   ` [Howm-eng 81] " xma
@ 2008-04-22 20:57     ` hugows
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hugows @ 2008-04-22 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)


I'm also in doubt about how to use them.
To me, a simpler tagging markup (http://lisperati.com/tagging.html) is
easier to understand and use:

 *todo groceries
 milk, soup, coffee

I'd like to implement those tags in howm :)

Regards,
Hugo

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Xavier Maillard <xma at gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:03:51 +0200,
> > Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > > It is not really clear how one should use the goto and come-from
> > > links. How are you all doing ? Is it prefered to use them as much
> > > as possible or not ?
> >
> > I also want to hear it. :-)
>
> Hum okay :)
>
>
> > In my experience, these are convenient for come-from keywords.
> > - names of machines
> > - names of softwares/commands
> > - names of authors of interesting books/papers
> > - names of lectures
>
> This is also how I am currently using them.
>
>
> > I cannot show a good general guide because I'm lazy, loose, and bad at
> > tidying.  I've already given up well-ordered notes.  Howm may be
> > suitable for those who are tired from strict systems.
>
> Actually, I think you totally are right. If I have chosen howm, this is especially for this: free form writing. But I am also curious so my questions...
>
> Regards
>
> Xavier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Howm-eng mailing list
> Howm-eng at lists.sourceforge.jp
> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/howm-eng
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-22 20:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-15 22:03 [Howm-eng 78] Effective use of <<< or >>> ? xma
2008-04-21 12:45 ` [Howm-eng 80] " khi
2008-04-22 19:49   ` [Howm-eng 81] " xma
2008-04-22 20:57     ` [Howm-eng 82] " hugows

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).