From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khi at users.sourceforge.jp (khi at users.sourceforge.jp) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:49:35 +0900 Subject: [Howm-eng 43] Re: customization In-Reply-To: <200804060000.m3600Ip7007684@localhost.localdomain> References: <200804060000.m3600Ip7007684@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi. At Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:00:20 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > This is an idea but why not take advantage of the abbrev > mechanism offered by emacs itself ? I do not know whether emacs > permits such abreviations though. Plus, with emacs 23, something > has changed on this side. (I am putting emacs-devel into the Cc > to get their feeling about this particular point). Hmm, I cannot understand your suggestion. Would you give me a concrete example of desired behaviors (not codes) ? By the way, do you know that you can type "C-c , i" to insert a registered keyword with completions? It is equivalent to typing "C-c , ," and RET on "[Key>]". You don't need to type >>> for such a keyword; it is automatically linked to the original come-from tag <<<. -- khi at users.sourceforge.jp