From: Ryan Zezeski <ryan@zinascii.com>
To: illumos-developer <developer@lists.illumos.org>
Subject: Re: [developer] Review: 13918 Want kernel test facility (IPD 20)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 11:24:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ed7vdgyi.fsf@zinascii.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m25xz35yw2.fsf@zinascii.com> (Ryan Zezeski's message of "Sun, 04 Feb 2024 21:03:50 -0700")
Ryan Zezeski <ryan@zinascii.com> writes:
Bringing this back up for review as I was told it might be of use to
someone. IPD 20 is now marked as published as well.
https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/1585
> I am once again asking for review. I've rebased, rebuilt, and retested.
> I took a hiatus for a while, but I'm thinking I'm back. I'd like to start
> by getting this across the finish line.
>
> https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/1585
>
> I also believe I still need someone to officially sponsor the IPD.
>
> https://github.com/illumos/ipd/blob/master/ipd/0020/README.adoc
>
>
> Ryan Zezeski <ryan@zinascii.com> writes:
>
>> Almost two years later and I finally got around to addressing CR. I am
>> sorry for such an extreme delay.
>>
>> Coming back to this with fresh eyes gave me a new perspective on some
>> aspects of the implementation. I think it's now a bit simpler. I also
>> added man pages for the command and kernel APIs. I have a more thorough
>> list in the CR comments. Speaking of the CR, given the length of time
>> between updates the diff view seems very confused if you diff patchset
>> #1 and #3. I'm happy to create an entirely new CR if that's desired.
>>
>> There's certainly still rough spots in places, but I thought that's
>> where the list could help me out. I'd like to get the initial version in
>> that is "good enough" so that this is no longer something just sitting
>> on a branch and others can improve on it without waiting for my slow
>> ass.
>>
>> I also updated the IPD to reflect the changes I've made in the
>> implementation.
>>
>> CR: https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/1585
>> Ticket: https://www.illumos.org/issues/13918
>> IPD: https://github.com/illumos/ipd/blob/master/ipd/0020/README.adoc
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> Ryan Zezeski <ryan@zinascii.com> writes:
>>
>>> I would appreciate anyone who can look at my proposed implementation of
>>> the Kernel Test Facility (aka ktest), as described in IPD 20. I would
>>> have liked to include more tests out of the gate, but honestly I think
>>> this chunk of work is already large enough as it is, and there are those
>>> who would have made use of ktest a year ago had it been ready. I also
>>> left a few TODOs in there, all of which I feel would be best done as
>>> follow-up changes.
>>>
>>> CR: https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/1585
>>> Ticket: https://www.illumos.org/issues/13918
>>> IPD: https://github.com/illumos/ipd/blob/master/ipd/0020/README.adoc
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>
> ------------------------------------------
> illumos: illumos-developer
> Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T95078dcc9ecf4b91-Me6ea8b7a0f822e78e3e6a5ca
> Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-14 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 4:04 Ryan Zezeski
2023-02-24 17:18 ` [developer] " Ryan Zezeski
2024-02-05 4:03 ` Ryan Zezeski
2024-02-15 5:38 ` Robert Mustacchi
2024-07-14 17:24 ` Ryan Zezeski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2ed7vdgyi.fsf@zinascii.com \
--to=ryan@zinascii.com \
--cc=developer@lists.illumos.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).