From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsgnkhibdk2cls0f@tutanota.com To: illumos-discuss Subject: How much OpenIndiana is lagging behind Linux in live usb technology? Message-Id: <17222933330.24Ea622A.23229@composer.illumos.topicbox.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:48:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17222933331.6F44f.23229 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: bb1b1704-4dfc-11ef-86ee-b81740decc0b --17222933331.6F44f.23229 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:48:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the gap is too far now. Linux people have developed all kinds of ov= erlay file systems with very good performance. MX Linux live usb is as fast= as when it's installed and all applications work awesomely. The installati= on of MX Linux is also a blink of eyes. The live usb version of OpenIndiana= booted very slow and also very slow when running live. I tried to open Fir= efox and Thunderbird. Both applications take ages to launch and all of them= crashed almost immediately leaving a big core file in jack's home director= y. The installation process of OpenIndiana is also awfully slow. The screen= saver triggered two or more times before it's finished. OpenIndiana live usb technology is even losing to FreeBSD. NomadBSD offers = a very stable live environment that is comparable to Linux. GhostBSD's inst= allation process is extremely quick. I think it's time for you to have a lo= ok at it and make improvements.= --17222933331.6F44f.23229 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:48:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think the gap is too far now. Linux peopl= e have developed all kinds of overlay file systems with very good performan= ce. MX Linux live usb is as fast as when it's installed and all application= s work awesomely. The installation of MX Linux is also a blink of eyes. The= live usb version of OpenIndiana booted very slow and also very slow when r= unning live. I tried to open Firefox and Thunderbird. Both applications tak= e ages to launch and all of them crashed almost immediately leaving a big c= ore file in jack's home directory. The installation process of OpenIndiana = is also awfully slow. The screensaver triggered two or more times before it= 's finished.

OpenIndiana live usb technology i= s even losing to FreeBSD. NomadBSD offers a very stable live environment th= at is comparable to Linux. GhostBSD's installation process is extremely qui= ck. I think it's time for you to have a look at it and make improvements.= --17222933331.6F44f.23229--