From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsgnkhibdk2cls0f@tutanota.com To: illumos-discuss Subject: Re: [discuss] How much OpenIndiana is lagging behind Linux in live usb technology? Message-Id: <17222940390.7FCBa.49150@composer.illumos.topicbox.com> References: <17222933330.24Ea622A.23229@composer.illumos.topicbox.com> <17222935480.D1d1A.177345@composer.illumos.topicbox.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:00:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17222940391.7fecdf7B4.49150 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6022da88-4dfe-11ef-b2e5-b81740decc0b --17222940391.7fecdf7B4.49150 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:00:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for clarification. But the overall experience with OpenIndiana li= ve usb is still very bad. You should have a look at it and do something to = improve the performance.= --17222940391.7fecdf7B4.49150 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:00:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you for clarification. But the overal= l experience with OpenIndiana live usb is still very bad. You should have a= look at it and do something to improve the performance.

= --17222940391.7fecdf7B4.49150--