* [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing
@ 2024-12-11 6:08 zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 8:23 ` [discuss] " zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 9:59 ` [discuss] " Peter Tribble
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: zt958bjm via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-11 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: illumos-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 772 bytes --]
Based on this blog post <https://ptribble.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-sunos-jdk-builder.html>, the maintainer has never enabled the test suites. I'm not a corporate user, so a TCK-passing OpenJDK is not really important to me, but I feel more confident when using the one. I'm using Azul's on both Linux and Windows because of that <https://www.azul.com/blog/use-tck-testing-to-ensure-that-your-java-distribution-conforms-to-the-java-se-specification/>.
Is there a TCK-passing OpenJDK for illumos, or will there be one soon?
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T9cf91d09b48c215e-M0d0ac4e8bfe52a4ca1ee8e50
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1342 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [discuss] Re: OpenJDK TCK Testing
2024-12-11 6:08 [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-11 8:23 ` zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 9:59 ` [discuss] " Peter Tribble
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: zt958bjm via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-11 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: illumos-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --]
I know ptribble is here. But how to tag him? I only have experience with Xenforo.
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T9cf91d09b48c215e-M8b3a426e05f853acce10ec5b
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing
2024-12-11 6:08 [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 8:23 ` [discuss] " zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-11 9:59 ` Peter Tribble
2024-12-11 12:12 ` zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Tribble @ 2024-12-11 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: illumos-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2141 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 6:08 AM zt958bjm via illumos-discuss <
discuss@lists.illumos.org> wrote:
> Based on this blog post
> <https://ptribble.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-sunos-jdk-builder.html>, the
> maintainer has never enabled the test suites. I'm not a corporate user, so
> a TCK-passing OpenJDK is not really important to me, but I feel more
> confident when using the one. I'm using Azul's on both Linux and Windows
> because of that
> <https://www.azul.com/blog/use-tck-testing-to-ensure-that-your-java-distribution-conforms-to-the-java-se-specification/>
> .
>
There are 2 entirely different things here.
The first is the built in test suites, which can be a bit of a hassle to
get running (especially on older
versions where Solaris was supported because they assumed the Studio
toolchain). I've been running
them in an ad-hoc fashion for ages; the builder automates that to make
running the test suite trivial.
Almost all of the tests pass, most of the failures I've fixed were errors
in the tests not errors in the jdk
we use. There are still some to fix.
Then the second part:
> Is there a TCK-passing OpenJDK for illumos, or will there be one soon?
>
The TCK is about branding and licensing. I enquired, and I'm unable to get
access to the TCK.
Even if I did, that would only apply if you got your copy of Java directly
from me - I wouldn't be
able to certify the jdk present in the different distributions. Access to
the TCK is heavily restricted
- as an example, AdoptOpenJDK were denied, which is why they ended up
merging into the
Eclipse foundation who were already a licensee.
If you want a TCK certified OpenJDK, then realistically the only plausible
route is that you'll have to
persuade one of the existing licensees to provide it.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T9cf91d09b48c215e-M5b86e319fb8e22a5b7371f62
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3654 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing
2024-12-11 9:59 ` [discuss] " Peter Tribble
@ 2024-12-11 12:12 ` zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: zt958bjm via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-11 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: illumos-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 324 bytes --]
Thank you for your answer. I confused the built-in test suites with the TCK.
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T9cf91d09b48c215e-Maf2e71e4bd34044a02171a66
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-11 12:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-11 6:08 [discuss] OpenJDK TCK Testing zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 8:23 ` [discuss] " zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
2024-12-11 9:59 ` [discuss] " Peter Tribble
2024-12-11 12:12 ` zt958bjm via illumos-discuss
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).