public inbox for discuss@lists.illumos.org (since 2011-08)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
@ 2024-12-15  7:32 nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15  8:50 ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-15  7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]

Tribblix is the only illumos still supports installing into UFS. But from what I know from my small research via Google, the state of UFS on illumos is not good. It's not even prepped for Y2038 problem. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-Ma359a0c7a77d4b4675e1d3fd
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 994 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15  7:32 [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos? nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-15  8:50 ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15  9:37   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-15  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss



> On 15. Dec 2024, at 09:32, nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss <discuss@lists.illumos.org> wrote:
> 
> Tribblix is the only illumos still supports installing into UFS. But from what I know from my small research via Google, the state of UFS on illumos is not good. It's not even prepped for Y2038 problem. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

state of ufs is ‘as is’. it does work, it is not developed any further unless someone will step up to do so. Just the same as with any other component in the OS. Things do not get magically done.

rgds,
toomas


------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-M175948133668628f19088836
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15  8:50 ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-15  9:37   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15 10:43     ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-15  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 325 bytes --]

Can you confirm that illumos UFS is not prepped for Y2038 problem is correct?
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-M26ccf17ad570d17a5c7b6b21
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 829 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15  9:37   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-15 10:43     ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-15 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]



> On 15. Dec 2024, at 11:37, nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss <discuss@lists.illumos.org> wrote:
> 
> Can you confirm that illumos UFS is not prepped for Y2038 problem is correct?
> illumos <https://illumos.topicbox.com/latest> / illumos-discuss / see discussions <https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> + participants <https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + delivery options <https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription>Permalink <https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-M26ccf17ad570d17a5c7b6b21>
Yes, that is correct. The Y2038 fix means change in on disk format (besides in-memory changes). Also we do not support sector sizes other than 512B. Those changes basically mean major version change and that is considerable amount of work to be done. Which we do not need to do because we already have zfs which does not have those limits.

rgds,
toomas
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-Mf4ec233470de613ad72886cc
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1659 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15  7:32 [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos? nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-15  8:50 ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
  2024-12-15 13:25   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-29 20:28   ` Eugene Bolshakoff
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Tribble @ 2024-12-15 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 7:32 AM nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss <
discuss@lists.illumos.org> wrote:

> Tribblix is the only illumos still supports installing into UFS. But from
> what I know from my small research via Google, the state of UFS on illumos
> is not good. It's not even prepped for Y2038 problem. Please correct me if
> I'm wrong.
>

I think support might be overstating it. There's an installer, it's been
known to produce
working systems. You lose a lot of capabilities along the way - no boot
environments,
upgrades, or zones.

And no, our ufs won't survive Y2038. And it cannot be fixed. There's not
really a lot of
reason to fix it, although we will at some point need to transition to an
alternative
mechanism to create the live ISO images.

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-Ma23cac25d45c7a565a63cad6
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2224 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
@ 2024-12-15 13:25   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
  2024-12-29 20:28   ` Eugene Bolshakoff
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss @ 2024-12-15 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 284 bytes --]

Thank you all for your explanations.
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-M4a2680f2a656ddc2b25410f0
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 788 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos?
  2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
  2024-12-15 13:25   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
@ 2024-12-29 20:28   ` Eugene Bolshakoff
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Bolshakoff @ 2024-12-29 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: illumos-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]

On Sunday, December 15, 2024, at 1:28 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> And no, our ufs won't survive Y2038. And it cannot be fixed. There's not really a lot of
> reason to fix it, although we will at some point need to transition to an alternative
> mechanism to create the live ISO images.
Oh, I didn't know that (or just I didn't remember), thank you Peter!
I had to use UFS on my Blade 100 because it had just 640M of RAM, now it has 1.5G and I can try installing on ZFS.
------------------------------------------
illumos: illumos-discuss
Permalink: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T32aa7926ac144054-Mc5c44abb065ac3e8f0bd23c8
Delivery options: https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1443 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-29 20:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-15  7:32 [discuss] [Tribblix] What is the current state of UFS on illumos? nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
2024-12-15  8:50 ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
2024-12-15  9:37   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
2024-12-15 10:43     ` Toomas Soome via illumos-discuss
2024-12-15 12:28 ` Peter Tribble
2024-12-15 13:25   ` nqxjlwvb via illumos-discuss
2024-12-29 20:28   ` Eugene Bolshakoff

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).