From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/1242 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fredrik Staxeng Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Why can't I use procmail Date: 30 Sep 2002 20:17:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1m7kh3s5p1.fsf@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> References: <1mfzvrs9ul.fsf@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668013 10361 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:40:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:28:51 2006 Original-Sender: fstx@Tempo.Update.UU.SE Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.update.uu.se Original-X-Trace: puffinus.its.uu.se 1033409199 news.update.uu.se (30 Sep 2002 20:06:39 +0100) Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!news.ccs.neu.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.39.3.168!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!puffinus.its.uu.se Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:1382 Original-Lines: 28 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 1382 Tue Jan 17 17:28:51 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:1242 Archived-At: Reiner Steib <4uce.02.r.steib@gmx.net> writes: > On Mon, Sep 30 2002, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > > > This has been irritating me ever since I started to use GNUS. It is > > mentioned in the FAQ, but I find the explanation less than satisfying. > > Which point in the FAQ do you mean? > (8. Procmail and Gnus)? Of course. I didn't see the first sentence. It could mean that it now works, but I can't find anything about it in the manual. Does it in fact work? > > Could somebody that knows please explain? Also please explain why > > procmail/mh can do it, but gnus can't? > > ,----[ ] > | `nnmh' is just like `nnml', except that is doesn't generate NOV > | databases and it doesn't keep an active file or marks file. This makes > | `nnmh' a _much_ slower back end than `nnml', but it also makes it > | easier to write procmail scripts for. > `---- But I really want to use nnml. -- Fredrik Stax\"ang | rot13: sfgk@hcqngr.hh.fr