From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2995 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lbudney@pobox.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Q: Score files and ancestors Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:35:07 GMT Message-ID: <3cexcy7n.fsf@pobox.com> References: <3ceykt22.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669233 17223 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:00:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:32 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.powertech.no!news.eunet.no!uninett.no!news.algonet.se!algonet!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!easynet-quince!easynet.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+rFTmO29L/8ysbCIoMiPjDEdInc= Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.201.50.193 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net Original-X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1063676107 151.201.50.193 (Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:35:07 EDT) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:35:07 EDT Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3136 Original-Lines: 17 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3136 Tue Jan 17 17:31:32 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2995 Archived-At: Jesper Harder writes: >> >> I can't tell from the docs; they suggest that "followup" applies only >> to followup articles. Does that mean articles with a matching article >> in the "in-reply-to" header? > > I'm too lazy to read the source right now -- but I think it means all > articles with the Message-ID of the matched article in the References > header. The docs seem to suggest that "thread" does that, implying that "followup" does something else. I too am too lazy to read the source tonight. --Len.