From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2241 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: help with spam.el Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:31:26 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4n7kaopvz5.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nhe9yeykj.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668746 14442 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:52:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:23 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!news.ccs.neu.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!news.harvard.edu!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu Original-X-Trace: plato.harvard.edu 1048523487 21491 134.174.9.133 (24 Mar 2003 16:31:27 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@plato.harvard.edu Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0vt9jjLta7IokD3jGLCd05HyMy4= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2381 Original-Lines: 48 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2381 Tue Jan 17 17:30:23 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2241 Archived-At: On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, shaoz@activesky.com wrote: > 1) according to documentation, all articles in spam group are > considered to be spam and they get the $ mark when entering the > group. I have set both spam-junk-groups and > gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents to nnfolder+archive:spam. But when > entering group, all articles are marked with E, is this the right > behaviour? In the spam group, *new* articles will have the spam mark. You are transferring spam articles from another group automatically to the spam group, so they are automatically expired already (since they were spam-processed in the original group). Otherwise, they would get processed as spam twice, which would be a bad thing. Generally, the spam mark is something an article will only see once briefly, before it's processed as spam and marked as expired. > 2) So far, I have to mark every spam message manually. My spam group > has already over 300 messages. But I have not got any marked > automatically by gnus yet, am I missing another step or config? I'm not sure what you mean by "automatically." What do you expect to happen, and what happens instead? You had this last time: '(gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents (quote (("spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) ("~/Mail/inbox" gnus-group-spam-classification-ham)))) '(gnus-spam-process-destinations (quote (("nnimap*" "spam")))) '(gnus-spam-process-newsgroups (quote (("spam" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile)) ("nnimap*" (gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile))))) '(spam-junk-mailgroups (quote ("spam"))) '(spam-use-ifile t)) Looking at your settings, you have unqualified group names for almost all the spam.el parameters - make sure you use ".*spam" if you want to match all folders that end with "spam", for instance. Also, "nnimap*" means "'nnima' followed by 0 or more letters 'p'," which is almost certainly not what you meant - you want "nnimap.*" I think. I'm still somewhat cautious about a folder called "~/Mail/inbox" by the way. Are you sure that's correct? If you have trouble setting the regular expressions you need, you can try using `G c' on a topic (if you use topics and have all your related groups under the same topic), or `G c' on a particular group in order to experiment with particular settings for spam/ham exit processors and contents classification. Thanks Ted