From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3455 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: gnus-parameters are ignored for spam-process (was: spam elisp with spam-stat) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:04:11 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nisiti7h0.fsf_-_@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <87hdyeh92z.fsf@everett.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669569 19045 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:06:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:32:15 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!collins.bwh.harvard.EDU!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: collins.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.80) Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1075489538 29056396 134.174.9.80 ([177066]) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cir5eHglB+vGmIcNnETsYxwVqaE= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3596 Original-Lines: 21 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3596 Tue Jan 17 17:32:15 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3455 Archived-At: On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, dmaze@mit.edu wrote: > David Hanak writes: > >> (setq gnus-parameters >> '((".*" >> (spam-process ((spam spam-use-stat) >> (ham spam-use-stat)))))) > > I don't set gnus-parameters directly in my setup; I have > > (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups > '(("nnml:.*" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-stat > gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat)))) Since this switch (from gnus-parameters to gnus-spam-process-newsgroups) worked for David, I think there may be a bug in the gnus-parameters code somewhere. I'm not familiar with it, sorry. Ted