From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3678
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: Re: crm114 and gnus
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:28:23 -0400
Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @
 Cienfuegos
Message-ID: <4nn05p7ygo.fsf@b2-15-1.bwh.harvard.edu>
References: <87ptc9l8fl.fsf@nezumi.home.spb> <87d67gptqu.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669709 19874 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:08:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:08:29 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:32:35 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!b2-15-1.bwh.harvard.EDU!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: b2-15-1.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.54.50)
Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1081276315 91414239 I 134.174.54.50 ([177066])
X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FR8tEkhPTZasMZVW38PWbNnOijE=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3819
Original-Lines: 19
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3819   Tue Jan 17 17:32:35 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3678
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3678>

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, kai@emptydomain.de wrote:

> Eugene Morozov <kaede.news@online.ru> writes:
> 
>> Does anyone use crm114 with Gnus? I'm too lazy to write
>> macros for training crm114 by forwarding mistakes back to
>> myself. :)
> 
> Is crm114 a spam filter?  There are hooks in Gnus for some other
> spam filters, eg bogofilter.  Something similar could be done for
> crm114, I guess, if it hasn't been done already.

I'll be adding a user-submitted patch for CRM114 to Gnus as soon as I
can get to it.

Also, I'll add a better mechanism for defining new spam backends.
Right now, it's too much trouble.

Ted