From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2280 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: help with spam.el Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:00:02 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nof3ioz7h.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nhe9yeykj.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4n7kaopvz5.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nvfy6850a.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nu1do4sb6.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668768 14563 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:52:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:27 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!news.ccs.neu.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!news.harvard.edu!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: chubby.bwh.harvard.edu Original-X-Trace: plato.harvard.edu 1049745603 24483 134.174.9.50 (7 Apr 2003 20:00:03 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news@plato.harvard.edu Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:00:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Cancel-Lock: sha1:up1MYLw+t0fCCd0We3TF7eHdLi0= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2420 Original-Lines: 40 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2420 Tue Jan 17 17:30:27 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2280 Archived-At: On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, shaoz@activesky.com wrote: > Please see my reply to an earlier article in this thread. My problem > is that I set the spam-split-group to be nnfolder+archive:spam which > turns out to be nnimap+xyz:nnfolder+archive:spam There is no way to do this in Gnus, as far as I know. The feature should be possible, though - I suggest making a separate post with the request, as it's not directly related to spam.el. > my problem 1: > > nnimap+private:~/Mail/inbox is spam split into > nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam nnimap:work:~/Mail/inbox is spam split > into nnimap+work:~/Mail/spam Manually marked articles are processed > into nnfolder+archive:spam > > I would like to have all these spams end up in one folder only. I > cannot find a way to specify that at the moment. As above, I don't know of a way to do this. You could use nnkiboze or nnvirtual to merge several groups into one virtual group. > my problem 2: > > Sometimes, spam split wrongly puts some hams in ~/Mail/spam. I tried > to mark the article as unread, but it still does not transfer the > article back to ~/Mail/inbox given I have set the > ham-process-destinations. Just to check, what does (spam-group-spam-contents-p "nnimap+private:~/Mail/spam") say? ham-process-destination only works in spam groups, but it seems that you have it set up correctly from what you posted. If that returns t, you'll have to trace through spam-summary-prepare-exit and see if spam-ham-move-routine is getting invoked properly. Thanks Ted