From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/3119 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: how to use bogofilter efficiently Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:54:18 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nvfqgkl05.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4noew9rq2t.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669322 17683 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 01:02:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:43 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!lockgroove.bwh.harvard.EDU!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.133) Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1066924501 30672489 134.174.9.133 (16 [177066]) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cpVIhcp7n+t+SCd5zcDxTfY7ojs= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:3260 Original-Lines: 34 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 3260 Tue Jan 17 17:31:43 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:3119 Archived-At: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, hoel@gl-group.com wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote: >> >>> However there a still false negatives, so the only possibility I >>> see is to move them to the folder SPAM and run bogofilter -s SPAM >>> but isn't there a better more efficient way to do it. >> >> You can add a bogofilter spam exit processor to the "SPAM" group. >> It will run the spam articles through bogofilter as you are >> describing it. It's not perfect yet, but should work for you. > > And how can a register my Ham as Ham for bogofilter? I'd like all > new mail not marked as Spam to be registered as Ham. Use the bogofilter ham exit processor. The question then becomes, what is and isn't ham? You have to not only add the bogofilter ham exit processor, you should also customize the ham-marks group parameter if the default is not right for you. For me, only ticked (!) articles are ham (so ham processing doesn't happen for all articles in a ham group), but you may want to expand that if you want more non-spam mail to be ham. There are also some settings on whether ham should be processed in all groups and spam groups: spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups and spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups; you can move ham around with ham-process-destination and spam with spam-process-destination... All this is in the Gnus manual, let me know if any part of it is unclear. Thanks Ted