From: Terrence Brannon <terry@hcoop.net>
Subject: nntodo - any need for more than 3 priority levels?
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:53:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6moeg45epl.fsf@Abulafia.hcoop.net> (raw)
I was thinking along the lines of having 5-10 levels of priority. 3
seems a bit too coarse for my way of thinking about things to do.
1 = urgent + takes a lot of time
2 = urgent + can get out of the way quickly
3 = important
4 = necessary
5 = optional, want to do
6 = optional, dont want to do
8 = would like to do
10 = i'll never get to it
--
Terrence Brannon, sundevil@livingcosmos.org, http://www.livingcosmos.org
reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6moeg45epl.fsf@Abulafia.hcoop.net \
--to=terry@hcoop.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).