* nntodo - any need for more than 3 priority levels?
@ 2005-01-05 10:53 Terrence Brannon
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Terrence Brannon @ 2005-01-05 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
I was thinking along the lines of having 5-10 levels of priority. 3
seems a bit too coarse for my way of thinking about things to do.
1 = urgent + takes a lot of time
2 = urgent + can get out of the way quickly
3 = important
4 = necessary
5 = optional, want to do
6 = optional, dont want to do
8 = would like to do
10 = i'll never get to it
--
Terrence Brannon, sundevil@livingcosmos.org, http://www.livingcosmos.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-01-05 10:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-05 10:53 nntodo - any need for more than 3 priority levels? Terrence Brannon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).