From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2010 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Bogofilter Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:09:12 +0100 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Message-ID: <84fzrao6gn.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <874r7vclji.fsf@ibook.optushome.com.au> <844r7vjc3l.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <81k7gq1z6a.fsf@shasta.cs.uiuc.edu> <9cfvg09rx37.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> <848yx4ctyf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <9cf7kcnrakt.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> <4nlm12ehn5.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668593 13519 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:02 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!p508771fc.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508771fc.dip.t-dialin.net (80.135.113.252) Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1043958334 35350491 80.135.113.252 (16 [73968]) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hr5w4GOmJytE4PN5AFQikclqZqg= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2150 Original-Lines: 21 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2150 Tue Jan 17 17:30:02 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2010 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, org@acm.isoboroff wrote: >> The _right_ thing to do is something like nnir, that is, a >> classifier framework that you can plug anything into underneath. > > I'm sort of working on that right now, it will be a generic framework > for spam.el. Ian is talking about text classification which could be used for general splitting (not just the spam/ham thing that spam.el does). This doesn't mean that spam.el is bad, just that it solves a different problem. I think that the tracking part could be useful for using text classification for splitting. But maybe it's enough to add the right hooks to Gnus, and spam.el uses them in one way whereas the use-a-classifier-for-splitting thing uses them in another way. -- Ambibibentists unite!