From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2584 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?Kai_Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Why asterisks in nnmail-split-fancy rule? Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 23:09:20 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Message-ID: <84llwe3ocf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <84znl46967.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87ptm0edoa.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <84vfvso03d.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <4nbrxk858v.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <84he7b2yk9.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <4nsmqv5nv8.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <84d6hzdw4u.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <4nof1i6duy.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <848yslraqf.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84he783oju.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84n0gzzo9b.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668964 15676 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:56:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:30:55 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pd9e1ea48.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e1ea48.dip.t-dialin.net (217.225.234.72) Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054933793 12896005 217.225.234.72 (16 [73968]) Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:c8BgvmOriN1zILN0i5Wd1k/sZaM= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2724 Original-Lines: 19 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2724 Tue Jan 17 17:30:55 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2584 Archived-At: Benjamin Rutt writes: > While we're on the topic, could you instead consider the patch I sent > recently to the ding list? My patch fixes the doc for > `message-fetch-field' as well as fixes a number of bugs in usages of > `message-fetch-field'. > > It's a little frustrating to see my patch ignored, and then see part > of my efforts reproduced a week later. *blush* I continually hit M-u on that message to keep it on my todo list. Maybe I should take the chance on the pentecost weekend to take a break from searching for a new job and relax a bit instead with Gnus hacking and patch integration and debugging and stuff... (I still wonder where that memory is going when I `J s'...) -- This line is not blank.