From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/13981 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Merciadri Luca Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups? Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:28 +0200 Organization: ULg Message-ID: <871vdmw3v3.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> References: <87fx2366mv.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> <87pr17bmxy.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <878w7vxvcf.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> <87wrvf8jy5.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87fx22bkcv.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> <87bpcqmr48.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273351222 708 80.91.229.12 (8 May 2010 20:40:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 20:40:22 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 08 22:40:19 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OAqos-0007PE-Vy for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 May 2010 22:40:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55062 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OAqos-0000lj-3k for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 May 2010 16:40:18 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:AWBO/pGCWMa7C0UYtkd33lsNKEw= Original-Lines: 78 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.197.101.67 Original-X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=6F>ePWTblD5H=^0YSB=nbEKnk; daOK_BWf_N5B`G2cTG; Mn1LGVLjEY^2Y8[=LHD=0P^Y49g\V1BeNHO95Z@8`56Df90`AEV7WNC4h0jQa\8L=M<:6 Original-X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:84330 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:13981 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry Adam for being not precise. asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:20:48 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > >> I am still unable to say why it does not work for the two groups given >> in the OP. > > What groups was that? > > In the original article you wrote: > > "Let's say that I need to post some message on two groups on usenet, > say hierarchy.group1 & hierarchy.group2." > > ... Sorry, I was sure of having written some real groups. I tested with linux.debian.user and comp.sys.hp48, together. These are groups which my Gnus did not post the article to. >> It might be because they both exist, but would it be that? > > That question does not parse for me. I understand why you did not understand it. I had forgotten the expression `to my news-gate', i.e. you should have read == It might be because they both exist to the news-gate, but would it be that? == The combination linux.debian.user + comp.sys.hp48 never works. That is, each time I try to send an article to both groups, it is sent nowhere. But I have only observed this behaviour with these two groups. >> I do not want to try with known groups (such as linux.debian.user, >> etc.), because it would pollute the group! > > But polluting gnu.emacs.gnus is just fine? Hrmpf. Not at all. The fact is that adding some `test' message to a discussion is not really polluting, it even takes place in the discussion. However, copying an answer of an already-launched dicussion on another usenet group makes it appear as a new article, which is clearly polluting. Don't you agree? > linux.debian.user sounds more like a mailinglist than a usenet group to > me, but since you used made-up group names in the first article, it is > hard to say. Yes, but posting to the ML or posting to the usenet group sends the message to the other, so that both are synchronized. > I think it is a fair guess that your problem isn't with Gnus. You might be thinking this because I was so unprecise that I was looking incompetent, and that, to my level, Gnus should not be bugging, and the error would only come from the user, i.e. me. If it is that, no problem, I understand that I should have been more precise. If it is not that, what would it be coming from? I have currently only one set of two groups which do not like to receive the same article in same time. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- Many receive advice; only the wise profit from it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 iEYEARECAAYFAkvlxXAACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhwy+gCfYFsCCYiWYnSE3OmKEA7REajT FOMAn35t5SiGqFZkXcpxF78Y37yn0edu =Hn2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----