From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/8915 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Howe Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: spam.el: copy/move of ham articles from unclassified groups Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:43:05 -0400 Organization: quadium.net Message-ID: <871widispy.fsf@rash.quadium.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177176912 17668 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2007 17:35:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 17:35:12 +0000 (UTC) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 21 19:35:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HfJUF-0003a9-O3 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:35:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfJZR-0006Gg-Lg for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:40:25 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.20 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dQvHPBZdv/p5DOfIthX97ADAIDs= Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.gnus:79098 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:8915 Archived-At: I'm running Gnus v5.10.7 and using spam-stat.el via spam.el for spam filtering. My setup is as follows: Mail is split according to senders, then if none matches the spam splitter is used. nnml:raw.spammy is my spam split destination; all the rest goes to nnml:raw. These 2 groups are unclassified (neither spam nor ham). I have a single group classified as spam: nnml:spam.explicit. This is my spam process destination. All other groups are classified as ham. Currently my workflow is as follows: enter the /nnml:raw\(\..*\)?/ groups, move all the ham articles into nnml:misc to be read or manually split later, then mark all the rest of the articles as spam and exit the group, causing them to be processed and moved to nnml:spam.explicit. Now (correct me if I'm wrong) I could have /nnml:raw\(\..*\)?/ classified as spam groups for the same basic effect. However I don't like that I lose all the score highlighting when they are auto-marked as spam, and I'm nervous about the default mark being "spam". Please tell me if this is a legitimate concern. I'm thinking what I will do is implement an interactive function which overrides the ! key in the raw groups. It will remove all marks and move the article into nnml:misc. Is there a reason that gnus-ham-process-destinations only works for spam groups and not in non-ham groups? If the registry is used that should avoid double-processing concerns, no? -- vsync http://quadium.net/~vsync/ The beauty of Amendment II is that it protects the ability to deal with both a tyrannical government and a zombie apocalypse. -- Eochada, http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2749371