From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/17401 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: max-size for displayed PGP image on signed email? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:20:11 +1100 Message-ID: <8761bq3sn8.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87386umg10.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87egqe0zsv.fsf@mm.st> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422519758 13566 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2015 08:22:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: info-gnus-english@gnu.org To: Kevin Brubeck Unhammer Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 29 09:22:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YGkMz-0003IU-Nv for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:22:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGkMz-0008Df-0r for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGkMv-0008DX-PP for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:22:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGkMq-0007Vf-NT for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:22:29 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]:4896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YGkMq-0007Vb-5T for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t0T8KG5e094042; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:20:17 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87egqe0zsv.fsf@mm.st> (Kevin Brubeck Unhammer's message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:13:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.101, required 4, AWL 0.00, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 203.23.236.77 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:17401 Archived-At: Kevin Brubeck Unhammer writes: > After some digging, it seems gnus-rescale-image returns early on some > articles because > > (not (get-buffer-window (current-buffer))) > > For articles where it works, current-buffer is > # > > For articles where it returns early, current-buffer is > # > > (Why does gnus-rescale-image need a current-buffer window anyway?) That's a good question. Off the top of my head, I can't see any particular reason for that limitation. Anybody? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/