* Spam inoculation mail support? @ 2004-03-08 13:53 Nuutti Kotivuori [not found] ` <4n7jxv2hqx.fsf@lifelogs.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Nuutti Kotivuori @ 2004-03-08 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw) I am wondering if Gnus already supports the draft for spam inoculation or training mails: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yerazunis-spamfilt-inoculation-03.txt Such a support would probably be rather trivial to implement. The only part which requires some carefulness is the md5 checksum calculation if that authentication is used. And while on the subject (I haven't had time to dig into spam.el deeply yet) - is there a simple way to have spam.el invoke some processor only when mails are moved from a spam group to a ham group or vice versa - eg. living with the assumption that everything has already been handled and only errors need to be trained. Thanks, -- Naked ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4n7jxv2hqx.fsf@lifelogs.com>]
* Re: Spam inoculation mail support? [not found] ` <4n7jxv2hqx.fsf@lifelogs.com> @ 2004-03-08 22:25 ` Hubert Chan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Hubert Chan @ 2004-03-08 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes: [...] Nuutti> And while on the subject (I haven't had time to dig into spam.el Nuutti> deeply yet) - is there a simple way to have spam.el invoke some Nuutti> processor only when mails are moved from a spam group to a ham Nuutti> group or vice versa - eg. living with the assumption that Nuutti> everything has already been handled and only errors need to be Nuutti> trained. Ted> Yes, I do that in my setup which is in the Gnus manual as a spam.el Ted> example. My mail gets sorted out on the mail server by Ted> SpamAssassin, and then misidentified spam goes into a "train" Ted> folder, while misidentified ham goes into a "trainham" folder. I Ted> don't do it personally, but you can set summary exit spam- and Ted> ham-processors that will run when the spam and ham are moved to Ted> "train" and "trainham" respectively. I think what he means is that when in a spam group, if he does "B m" to move the article to a ham group, the ham processor should be called. (If that isn't what he meant, it's something that I would like to see, since it fits my workflow better.) I think that would be related to one of the functions I was planning on writing, which would allow you to call the processors on selected articles. Then you could remap "B m" to a function that calls the ham processors and then moves the article. (Or if gnus-summary-move-article uses hooks, you could do that.) Unfortunately, real life has kept me busy of late. I'm hoping that I can get some coding in next week... -- Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-08 22:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-03-08 13:53 Spam inoculation mail support? Nuutti Kotivuori [not found] ` <4n7jxv2hqx.fsf@lifelogs.com> 2004-03-08 22:25 ` Hubert Chan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).