From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19910 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2022 02:10:58 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Aug 2022 02:10:58 -0000 Received: from localhost ([::1]:40854 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oR2Kd-0002Kc-VE for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:10:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oR2KO-0002KF-4A for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:10:40 -0400 Received: from pv50p00im-ztdg10011901.me.com ([17.58.6.50]:39392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oR2KL-00053I-HJ for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:10:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1661393434; bh=XQlo4ZuZXsQrHczy+hIMigZsAervvtWn9lfBsweSVK0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NJx7/4+CaVuuj1wWpvsZ2IsH7KkWAlNt23tl+cTRd6JRECB7WIz9jUktCDzwYfA1Z Qh0OoNJTGcliq0P/5qb4ymE0Fvm0U3K5aV+tSRuwbnfm1lToUyuOJmfSyXdSpFEk8Z GMnOKOnqM8s9CIBfeXKXLHAohCVe3WaNqq21BEcaa5xyrCN2537e/yjDq3Du4Scq7B Q6KhHKMF7vVBOLr7ERmyRtSLsX8kREvWq2uWvHBTzfcrINYtFVcOVzYFPITTklJe9b nusdsWqTbb0xsrjzT6LhUgH3HE3+k4Jpr/d2itfD0vNFKr3YIe7379eaFBJs1HAnqf yQZZ762r6RXig== Received: from arch (pv50p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.56.9.10]) by pv50p00im-ztdg10011901.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD7B33A0671 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 02:10:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Satoshi Yoshida To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Subject: Re: Strip signature on reply without standard separator References: <87y1vykpl2.fsf@icloud.com> <87zggbz3ho.fsf@icloud.com> <87bksaz837.fsf@icloud.com> <87a67ul62m.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87mtbufg7e.fsf@icloud.com> <875yii2oru.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87tu61i8gt.fsf@web.de> X-Operating-System: Linux version 5.19.3-arch1-1 Arch Linux x86_64 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:10:32 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87tu61i8gt.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:26:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87a67t6pk7.fsf@icloud.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-GUID: 7j5Ajct8BouX3icQO909tltZy0IMK97j X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 7j5Ajct8BouX3icQO909tltZy0IMK97j X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.517,18.0.572,17.11.64.514.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-06-21=5F01:2022-06-21=5F01,2020-02-14=5F11,2022-02-23?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F01_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=283 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2208250007 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.58.6.50; envelope-from=dynamisxar@icloud.com; helo=pv50p00im-ztdg10011901.me.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+ml=inbox.vuxu.org@gnu.org Sender: "info-gnus-english" Michael Heerdegen writes: > Yes - and you want to make your lambda forms subject to evaluation, for > several different reasons. They are not data. You want to use the > return value, not the expression. Thank you for your easy-to-understand explanation. -- Satoshi Yoshida