possible bug in hide signature

possible bug in hide signature

[Emanuel Berg]

I have found a special case when

(setq gnus-treat-hide-signature t)

does seem to have a bug (?).

It is when the signature contains asterisks, like in
this dump [1].

I found that this solved it:

(setq gnus-article-prepare-hook
      (lambda () (gnus-article-hide-signature nil 1) ))

[1] http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/sig.ppm

-- 
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united:  http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573

Re: possible bug in hide signature

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:

> It is when the signature contains asterisks, like in
> this dump [1].
>
> I found that this solved it:
>
> (setq gnus-article-prepare-hook
>       (lambda () (gnus-article-hide-signature nil 1) ))
>
> [1] http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/sig.ppm


-- 
*This*Is*A*Test*

Re: possible bug in hide signature

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

>> It is when the signature contains asterisks, like in
>> this dump [1].

I'm unable to reproduce this bug.  It seemed to work fine on the test
message.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/

Re: possible bug in hide signature

[Emanuel Berg]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

>>> It is when the signature contains asterisks, like
>>> in this dump [1].
>
> I'm unable to reproduce this bug.  It seemed to work
> fine on the test message.

Yes, I should have copied the whole signature! But I
was for some reason very convinced it was the
asterisks. Oh well.

-- 
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573