From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/1835
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: spamtrap@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?q?Sj=F8gren?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user
Subject: spam-stat-load in spam-stat.el from Oort Gnus 0.10
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 12:11:03 +0100
Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark
Message-ID: <87d6n4lz5k.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138668485 12892 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:48:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:29:46 2006
Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!sunsite.dk!news.szn.dk!news.koldfront.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: virgil.koldfront.dk
Original-X-Trace: virgil.koldfront.dk 1042283463 8225 127.0.0.1 (11 Jan 2003 11:11:03 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@koldfront.dk
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 11:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09001 (Oort Gnus v0.10) XEmacs/21.4 (Military
 Intelligence, i386-debian-linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:K7r4Z7KprgSc6FjSp6gPVSjohq8=
Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:1975
Original-Lines: 55
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 1975   Tue Jan 17 17:29:46 2006
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:1835
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/1835>

  Hi.


I've started using spam-stat.el and fancy splitting (which is really
nice, by the way!), and I've encountered a strange problem:

If I put the recommended incantation in .gnus:

 (require 'spam-stat)
 (spam-stat-load)

then normal good clean email gets classified as spam. If I do a M-:
(spam-stat-score-buffer) in one of the non-spam buffers, I get score
of 1.0.

Weird.

I tried training spam-stat again, lo and behold, the same buffer now
scores 1.162711802755615e-30.

Oh, well, maybe I trained it wrong the first time. Quit Gnus, quit
XEmacs, try spam-stat-score-buffer on the same buffer again - back to
1.0!

Hmm.

Okay, lets try something silly:

 (require 'spam-stat)
 (spam-stat-load)
 (spam-stat-load)

in .gnus.

Quit XEmacs, start again: Now the score is consistently
1.162711802755615e-30 (even if I quit XEmacs and start again).

Weird, no?

The only thing I could think of[1] was to C-h v spam-stat - but that
seemed to give the same output whether I spam-stat-load'ed once or
twice.

Any ideas?


  Best regards,

   Adam

[1] Yes, that is a testament to my (still) lacking learning lisp.

-- 
 "Hmm, der er ikke særligt mange folk med                      Adam Sjøgren
  elver-ører i denne her film!"                           asjo@koldfront.dk