Re: nnimap-split-download-body removed?

[Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>]

Bodertz <bodertz@gmail.com> writes:

>> I'm not sure how big of a rewrite this would require. First fetching
>> headers only wouldn't be hard, but then we'd need to somehow partially
>> fake a run of the splitting process in order to know which messages
>> needed more. How do you indicate in your splits that the body should
>> be examined?
>
> I guess an additional splitting character could be introduced (maybe @).
> And instead of splitting then and there it would push the article number
> onto some list, and then after all the normal non-body-splitting
> happens, if that list is non-nil, `nnimap-fetch-inbox' would download
> the bodies for those messages and run the split again.  But I don't
> really know.
>
> Going back to what I said earlier about just having the function in the
> `(: function)' split download the body, it seems like that is possible.
> Because it's in the split rule, it only deals with one message at a
> time, so it is inefficient in that sense.  In my case, I expect
> on-demand downloading of the occasional message body to be more
> efficient than downloading the body of every message and not using most
> of them, but maybe I'm mistaken.

TBH I don't think it's very likely we'll do a major rewrite to
accommodate this case. Particularly if body-scanning is only likely to
happen for a smaller subset of messages, I'd just do it the way you're
doing it below.

> Anyway, the code is messy, and not quite right (it doesn't clean up the
> `^M's for example), but it does seem to work in the sense that I can
> search for strings in the body and split based on that.  I don't know
> which if any of these save-(excursion|restriction|match-data) forms are
> required.
>
>
> (setq nnimap-split-download-body-default nil)
>
> (defun scratch/test-split ()
>   (current-buffer) ;; => " *nntpd*"
>   (save-excursion
>     (save-restriction
>       (save-match-data
> 	(goto-char (point-min))
> 	(re-search-forward (rx "X-nnimap-article: "
> 			       (group (+ digit))))
> 	(let* ((article (match-string 1))
> 	       (command (format "UID FETCH %s (UID BODY.PEEK[])" article))
> 	       (full-message
> 		(with-current-buffer (nnimap-buffer)
> 		  (let ((message-start (point-max)))
> 		    (nnimap-send-command command)
> 		    (buffer-substring message-start (point))))))
> 	  ;; Clear the original message (with only headers)
> 	  (delete-region (point-min)
> 			 (point-max))
> 	  ;; Insert the full message
> 	  (insert full-message)
> 	  ;; Finally split based on message body
> 	  (goto-char (point-min))
> 	  (if (search-forward "Test Gnus Splitting" nil t)
> 	      "mail.bodertz.test"
> 	    "mail.bodertz"))))))

You might try putting the `full-message' text in a temp buffer and
running `nnimap-transform-split-mail' on it first, that might clear up
some of the oddities of the body text itself. I would keep both the
`save-restriction' and `save-match-data'. Otherwise looks like this will
do what you want!


_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english