From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/2673 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jesseh@cs.kun.nl (Jesse F. Hughes) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: Re: Some functions for curmudgeons Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:41:20 +0200 Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Message-ID: <87el1japnj.fsf@phiwumbda.localnet> References: <87n0gbgsur.fsf@phiwumbda.localnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138669017 15953 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 00:56:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: nobody Tue Jan 17 17:31:03 2006 Original-Path: quimby.gnus.org!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.nask.pl!news.man.poznan.pl!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!surfnet.nl!kun.nl!wnnews.sci.kun.nl!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: catv2171.extern.kun.nl Original-X-Trace: wnnews.sci.kun.nl 1056440556 4114 131.174.122.171 (24 Jun 2003 07:42:36 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sci.kun.nl Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Mail-Copies-To: poster X-face: %~L/gE]R-~x=ts~2{uqw2UbIBo"-}9IOSP>u[,.*)zvo,`6A3&E)_wz)[rn^My@(eY(.(7D A8EwTYfhf*u~,Eu,tf6$HN*MY&)u0G=N' x<%)/"s=GZ_BD2Qz9m=S%4v^I+>T|'1{w70ZY=ih,=)kM"Y_}?{%)x0)];K\~@J6m5.EN?>Zh\Xh;Y V|',x(js'Jfq02joVpj|#x User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4BnP8MBE1zcLgDsC5htQ3Wzd9lk= Original-Xref: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de gnus-emacs-gnus:2813 Original-Lines: 39 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 2813 Tue Jan 17 17:31:03 2006 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:2673 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > jesseh@cs.kun.nl (Jesse F. Hughes) writes: > >> Now, here's the problem: Lots of folks on Usenet are sloppy and lazy >> writers, relying on stupid smiley faces in place of actual humor and >> using the same hackneyed phrases so often that acronyms are >> sufficient. Very annoying. > > Heh!!!! Funny. :-) I knew that my rules would lower the score some of the most knowledgeable posters on gnu.emacs.gnus, but just to show how forgiving I am: You lost 1 point for the smiley. The excessive use of exclamation points didn't cost anything. I am so magnanimous that I allow four in a row before scoring lower. Not too bad. Some time, I will write a function that scores a poster down if the amount of quoted material vastly exceeds the amount of new material. Not that your reply above counts in this respect -- I'm thinking of people that quote 100 lines to write "me too". Also, maybe I should lower top-posters, too. This is why I love Gnus. You can satisfy some of the frustrations of an impotent peon in the modern world by pretending you have a modicum of power in the form of retributive scoring functions. What other news readers offer such therapeutic value? -- "I don't know why I live in a world with so many supposed mathematicians who are all so dumb AND rude. Why oh why couldn't someone like Gauss or Dedekind still be around? Shoot, I'd even take someone like Hardy at this point." -- James S Harris compromises