From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.user/18909 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?U2HFoWEgSmFuacWha2E=?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user Subject: nnmaildir vs nnimap Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:24:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftvunpqs.fsf@atmarama.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542832428 3705 195.159.176.226 (21 Nov 2018 20:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:33:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) To: info-gnus-english@gnu.org Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 21:33:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZBv-0000rN-QV for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:33:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZE2-0003B4-B3 for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:35:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZDx-0003AJ-FV for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZ2w-0001oI-Nz for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=50168 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZ2w-0001hs-Gz for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPZ0h-0003gS-11 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:22:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEWx0882mfHv7ORs VCH///9cEQLDAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB+ILCwo7 H4ukwSIAAAGHSURBVDjLXVMBtsMgCEO5gG4X4NkLOLn/3RZAWy3/7bdLShJwJSIq+KRUvahZCa2a MOrjTKN4oj3E7Gnz8uB3S0nw2BqqOWbTMvedqB7GiFRox63FOgAfSiDCI+Hv7KgzLzn+W+i31tzE iJLK2VCLEEZP9Fb6VV9TKi9vVDr3VPa78hCfBtM5a7mntpEsi+V3IqZjWlu2mD3VUjzSXNsihKGQ CEcx8kYI9idZYo1B9NaGHx1kERiP5JCCd5xDdsU8F/Z4TGj7soj7Iq8OiyCBCIVcfABc0HARCTn8 uxyQpZF54FYycdiJzWAED5PIAHteccjThzSFoF81ImHIS9Vxl+kG4+4atjzzSdFGTknE1zExEhnB eLDGNM8KIBP3TqwRxROyObE1GKGaBYV51CIodxIw9k0VHXFjz9uvoZese8GUO8yZmV6EFj9G6f0g lCneQWEb+ikhvl/OXau3Ky9CZCMGNnB3CB/E857LaY6ZnICkvmp5ND47RrO1WYY9b7875OUxELn9 AY6AaRnJCos+AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDE4LTExLTExVDA5OjU5OjMxKzAxOjAwwuJ+ UQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAxOC0xMS0xMVQwOTo1OTozMSswMTowMLO/xu0AAAAASUVO RK5CYII= Cancel-Lock: sha1:KOWkLtzziREqCrptrdHyWHy5Nqs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "info-gnus-english" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:18909 Archived-At: Hello, in the past I had several instances that the mail which was sent from Gnus (using smtpmail) did fail with (gcc-self . "nnimap+gour:INBOX.Sent") and therefore I'm thinking how to prevent it in the future... Today, after resuming my Gnus setup, I noticed that instead of (gcc-self . "nnmaildir:gour.sent") I had to use (gcc "nnmaildir:gour.sent") Now, I am not sure whether to just use nnmaildir back-end where msmtp is used for sending and the mail is fetched either via mbsync or, possibly, getmail or to use nnimap back-end, msmtp for sending and then e.g. getmail in order to have local copy of my mail from remote IMAP servers. So, the question is whether using nnimap does provide some advantages over just using nnmaildir which is used for storage of my archive along with motmuch? Sincerely, Gour -- Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.